Like typically with Finns and objectively thinking people at large, my thoughts have certain areas of validity which I have tried to make as large as possible, but which is determined by the understanding I have, what it is suited to. The area of validity cannot be widened to include new areas, new groups of people that I happen to get to know, since it is not a question of noticing different types of people or understanding them via experience. Like, if the largest group that I can say something about is vehicles, it cannot be widened to include riders and pedestrians. Or if it were cars, it cannot be widened to include bicycles, boats etc. That is so because we Finns are already good at thinking. We are not in the leaerning phace, but skilled already when we write something to be published.
For the last four years i have concentrated more and more on writing my text Skills of Christmas gnomes. I do not know why but it is globally interesting subject that many read about sometimes. But the text has been ready for over a month, and i no longer have anything global to write about. So my career in writing is over, even though like others in this modern era i may write this and that, texts of no big signifogance or of not so good quality. Writing has obstructed my lufe surprisingly much, so there aren't much new subjects to write about.
Kommentit
Lähetä kommentti