My texts are all aimed at objectively thinking readers. I am /have been unusually good in objective thinking, so I try to write about my thoughts and skills which support wished for wisdom of life in thid technologizing and globalizi g world. But the tale like subjects and my healing blogs confuse the view. Maybe one would understand better what my input is like, if one would consider the blog http://workandfreetime.blogspot.com central in my type of input. I feel tgat these times need this kind of new thoughts and skills, but that in practice many would learn them from the works of other writers, artists, etc, when though the original thoughts/texts on a general level were often mine.
I used to be marked on some spiritual side world's best in objective thinking, so most of my life this far, so do not suppose that others would have these skills even if they are a university professor or some artist, priest, a rationally thinking woman with wisdom of life about feelings or whoever maybe famous skilled person. Some may have such skills, but there has been a so big demand kn the air for me to write these, even if it would be my lifetime's work, that it is propable that those were lacking from others.
For your social eye, square is less complex thinking than a school kibd of picture of the world, and generally in skill levels square fwatures are less comolex than kind of curved complex well running features in looks etc.
So it is not likely that most of my texts would contain any error, but some may contain mistakes, lack slme explanations, or have been written when with a poor head or not of a subject that I would support. So instead of arguing, maybe askkng for clarificatiln or extra info about somethkng, or a new text of a similar subject would be ok, and most typical would be to ask help in solving some problem in the world which seems to go ok with my skills or with my texts as a backup.
*
As academical work my social position might comoare with a docent: somehow valuable talented work but jyst piles of paper gathering dust somewhere, not socially interesting like a lecturer often might be for some, enough to listen to a lecture in an interesting subject. The usefulness of my texts is like that of a single theoretical point to some who do or would lije to do practical work in such a subject and who have enough other skills and experience of lufe for such. See for example my blog post in this same blog: https://aboutmytexts.blogspot.com/2024/03/blog-posts-marked-somehow-central-in-my.html .
Kommentit
Lähetä kommentti