Writing needs lots of social eye

I slept long in the beginning of this year 2019 and have been more stupid and stuck than usual, especially to begin with. At first I could not write more than e-mails, then I blogged something with my old memorized understanding, quite theory like, then I have slowly regained my understanding but social eye is still lacking and the end result is just unwise, more like a bomb attentat than some nice hobby like blogging suited for many to read: either nice additiob to some skill of their or uninteresting if they are not interested in the subject. Formerly I thoughts of the society and even the wider world via different ways of thinking and how would they learn from my text and how would they communicate and would it cause communication errors or conflicts of values, but now I still haven't been able to do so. I think that journalists much have extremely much such and more skills in what comes to the social eye and workings of the society when they write just ordinary texts for public audience.

Following personal likings is where you find your best skills

I have learned a lot about learning skills and talents,

also about changing profession quite many things, but

it seems that each person has a personal inclination,

some jobs that she/he is inclined toward and some that

she/he is not suited to by one's endurancy, likings,

motivation, goals in life, values, ways etc, and some

things that she/he needs a lot as stimuli and some that

she/he cannot use at least not much. It seems to me

that one cannot affect the personal inclination by

learning, even though one can learn things that are

suited to most, to just about all and bring enjoyment &

other benefits.

Formerly I have not been able to explain why someone is

inclined the way she/he is, but just a moment ago this

though came to my mind. Usually people avoid routes

that they cannot use or find hard to bear and such may

be ones that are foprced upon them too detailedly and

too rigidly so that they cannot find their own way to

be with such things and skills. And so they use routes

that they find easy and pleasant and that they can use

in their own ways and in their own rythms, and so they

like jobs that allow them to use just those routes a

large part of the time or all the time. Still, those

pleasant routes aren't just something that is available

but depend on the person's likings which I cannot

explain. Across time the person learns new skills on

the area f his/her likings, which is very different

from being drugged and so not open toi learn with one's

whole capacity and not naturally motivated to just

those things so that one's whokle picture of the world,

one's whole understanding and insight, one's experience

oflife would support just those areas of life, like

when following likings and full understanding in a

natural way.

When I entered school

When I at the age of 7, August 1978, entered school, I felt that the ways of thinking of school were much more stupid and stuck than my own objective thinking, my own level of wisdom at that age. And I felt that even though all did not think of it that way, there was to some extend the same effect to other kids, since learning to read is a completely new thing that requires recognizing shapes which often means recognizing styles which gets support from kind of philosophical and arts' view on the world and some kind of understanding of structures, their strenght and the value of feelings. Likewise learning the basics of all basic school subjects, for example history's main lines and geagraphy, is a new thing on the first class, much more demanding task than school later on. So I felt that school did not use the potential of kids fully, even though the kid's background in having sung, drawn, played outdoors, done practical tasks, sports, being social, discussing etc was needed.

Old times' wisdom in the modern world

I sometimes ponder about old Finnish art and books: such great fracturelessness and wisdom, why does it not carry in the modern world? Did the same happen in other countries to their traditional wisdom? I think that what the old times' art and books do not carry are cultural differencies in the modern world: the audience is just bigger than the works of art etc were planned for, culturally much too different and varied. In the modern world such pieces of art and books are read, watched and listened by many who are interested in that culture, so they should bring a very good result if applied abroad by people who like that culture's approach, want to try it out. They are likely to be the foreigners who largely handle that country's affairs in such things that demand knowing the culture and it's art and books at least somewhat. So if they cannot use something, they are likely to bypass it and change to othert subjects and so such wisdom does not carry, since it's audience is too small, all in an international environment of also the old audience in the homeland. And at the same time the material ought to be useful in the homeland for both foreigners and citizens, kind of one area of life for the culture's wusdom. And it ought to spread abroad an understanding of what the culture'sapproach is and what the good sides of it are also in widely different environments, kind of spreading the civilized wisdom to what wisely looking ought to be it's place in the world.

Many of my own texts seek to support succh old wisdom at large in the modern world.
You can learn a good way of thinking at http://quickerlearning.blogspot.com/ .
See also MY BOOK "Hard Rationality of Feelings and Instincts", to which there is the link http://www.angelfire.com/planet/paradisewins/HardRationalityOfFeelings.pdf. .
 And also about the value-free grounds for moral http://2013paradise.blogspot.com/2017/08/basics-of-my-paradise-theory.html  .
 .About feelings, rationality and moral as computers develop http://feelingcomputers.blogspot.com/2011/08/far-future-with-computers-what-will.html .
You can see a list of my blogs in my profile: click my name or picture to get there.

About how I live and work

I have now written some20 years, without pay, i just have felt that such texts are needed, and so I have written them to the internet and lived with small money. My texts are useful in the society and for the world, so it is kind of agreed about work for me, even though without pay. I write to www.blogger.com (internet addresses ending .blogspot.fi or .com) which is a free blog site by Google that is as far as I know available in many countries, and is a quite nice way to make blogs with text, some pictures and maybe videos, and has several different looks for the blogs to choose from. (A piece of advice about writing fact text http://musicalfactlanguage.blogspot.com/2018/11/another-subject-succeeding-in-writing.html ).
I live in an apartment house in town and have two middle-sized or quite small dogs. http://picturesfrommyhome.blogspot.com

I have written about subjects that interest many. Yet when I have sent a blog link to a discussion group on largely the same subject, so that I would have thought to reach 500 visitors, the counter in my blog editor has shown only 14 coming from that discussion group to my blog. So maybe the visibility isn't always as large as one would imagine. Yet I think that there needs to be teaching material in most of these subjects that I have written about.

 .

One cannot learn skills from higher skill level than what one already understands somewhat

Usually one cannot learn new skills from persons that one has not oneself by one's own observation skills noticed to be skilled in the things that ne wants to learn. So not for example of persons who have the reputation of being the most skilled, if you do not see it yourself, since they do things in so complex or well thought of ways that there are too many things to learn at the same time, too vaguely in sight with too mcuh variation and too mcuh complaxity, too finely tuned observational skills needed and too much information of the subject needed. But sometimes people with high skills have written teaching material, so if that is of the right skill level for you, you can study that even if you cannoit learn by copying from them personally. But often also such material demands a too high starting level. Then you must find teachers & courtses in those basic skills. Luckily those things are usually better taught and have professional teachers with good teaching skills.

My texts do not fit uneducated tropics with poor eyesight

All of my texts and videos presuppose a starting level roughly given by having learned my thinking course http://quickerlearning.blogspot.fi . The thinking course presupposes a good eyesight, a good ability to understand what one sees and observe landscapes with an understanding of the structures in them. As far as I know most human races have these basic skills of looking but those from black Africa do not have them but look with social eye like one observes the shapes of trees and bushes in darkness, thinking if they are maybe like monsters. Also heavy food on a hot day is not good for understanding what one sees, neither are air conditioned (cooled) indoors as an environment where one uses one's eyes most.

A game: sinking ships

I just rememebered a game of sinking war ships we sometimes played when I was a kid, mainly against my mom, and it maybe increased problem solving skills later, but we did not play it so often.

Mostly there are just two players. Each player has a grid boxed ordinary writing or counting paper and a pen. They choose a square of a suitable size, for example 8 times 8 boxes, and a nice number of war ships fitting well to it, for example one row of five boxes, two ships of four, three ships of three boxes in a row, four ships of two and five ships of one box.  They also number the boxes by marking numbers from 1 to 8 to the side  and letters from A to H to the top so that each box is easy to refer to.
Then they each secretly, without showing to the opponent, draw the ship outlines to their water area. No twio ships may be side by side but corners touching is ok.
Then they try to guess where the ships of the other player are and hit them to sink the ship under the water. They each in turn mention a box, for example B3, and the other one checks if there is a ship there in her/his paper, and so she/he answers "It hit but did not yet sink." or "Flew past." if there is no ship there, or "It hit and it sank." if there was a ship and it's all places had been hit. So they need another box where to mark their guesses theyt have already made: just cross the box in quaéstion and make some mark of whether there was a ship there. Similarly you can on your own ships' pool make markings of the guesses the other onbe has made.

Somehow I feel that this is good for making guesses about possible solutions and for building upon the werll working ones.

* * *

15. July 2018   My mom always said to me that killing in war is needed and so it is good to have soldiers' skills, both shooting and fighting and sports skills and thinking skills and other skills and understanding about the workings of a society. But that preparing to make murders is a different thing since it is usually done in the shelter of lies and acting, which as a habit as one prepares for future murder possibiluity is too much lies and cunning to allow one see clearly how things go in the world, and so it is not advisable but should be avoided. Killing in a peace time fight she did not consider likewise bad, if it is an honest fight. But many do plan to make murders and practise skills for them, and so they lose sight of the society at large, and often of wisdom of life too, and misjudge typically who is like what and who should be supported and who did not bejhave werll enough to fit into a society.
If one compares to this game, an honest one is not always in trouble, because honesty is a different thing from being talkative. An honest person also more often is supported by high skills, while liares often cover a lack of skills. An honest person also often sees what is true in the words of another one, while a liar tends to lose sight of which claims are honest.

My mom liked mathematics

My mom was always fond of mathematics. My parents called mathematics the queen of sciences.  My mom once said that seh had had in school math number 11 on scale from 4 to 10, and that later the teachers had rised it to 14. I did not believe it then, but could it have explained why my parents forced me to study math in university, even though I never had even glimpse of any new idea, of any work result in math. My mom was full of new ideas for new math results. She seemed to keep associations in daily life as sources for new ideas in math.
I have never liked math. I am much more inclined to objective thinking like philosophy and to practical things to do, arts, nature, religions, caring the world to a good state. I did not feel that math studies after schoolwould have had any use for anything. I have written my view about my mom's math talents in my Finnish blog http://pikakoulu.blogspot.fi

My view on the right ways of living

I am for healthy ways of living and doing, see my long list of advices about them http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/2015/11/healthy-ways-of-living.html

Kirjoituksiani

"

Kirjoituksiani

Olen kirjoittanut muutamia kirjoituksia, joilla on kai maailmassa erityisesti väliä:
* Ajattelukurssi http://pikakoulu.blogspot.fi/2011/11/ajattelukurssi.html : arkijärkisen objektiivisen ajattelun kurssi, lyhyt, helppo ja selkeä, opettaa kunnollisen ajattelukyvyn, jos katseleminen ja käytännön tekemiset kuten käsityöt ilman mielikuvitusta ja puutarhanhoito sujuvat taitotason puolesta ok, eli koulutetun tyyppinen objektiivinen ajattelu, joka on helppo pitää mukana myös muissa taidoissa ja elämässä laajemmin, mm kokonaiskuvallinen: rakenteet oikein hahmottava maisemakatse, mistä ajattelukurssi neuvoo tarkemmin, että miten. Tällä ajattelutyypillä mm määritelmäiä on helppo tehdä myös ei-niin-konkreettisissa asioissa: hahmottaa ne maisemakuvana ja määrittelee alueen kuin antaisi rakennusohjeita tuossa maisemassa. Tämän pitäisi olla ajattelun perusmuoto, vailla maneereja ja mielivaltaisuuksia.
* Englanninkielinen kirjoitelma tulevaisuuden tietokoneista: Tietokoneille tunteet (tavoitteellinen toiminta rinnasteusena tunteiden vaikutukselle), järki (luonnontieteet ja niiden mittausmenetelmät käyttävät pitkälti matematikkaa ja karttoja) ja moraali (kannattavuussyyt mekaanisella kielellä) objektiivisesti: http://feelingcomputers.blogspot.fi/2011/08/far-future-with-computers-what-will.html
* Lisäksi olen kirjoittanut siitä, miten kannattavuusperustelut (rakenteen kuvaus) tukevat terveitä elämäntapoja ja järkiperusteista moraalia, mikä teoreettisena ideaalina, kuten tietokoneille ohjelmoitavissa olevassa maailmankuvassa on mielekästä, tarkoittaisi terveen luonnontilaisen maailman rakennetun tuella muodostamaa alkuparatiisia muistuttavaa tulevaisuudenparatiisia http://2013paradise.blogspot.fi/2017/08/basics-of-my-paradise-theory.html , mikä tietenkin onnistuessaan olisi maailmanlaajuinen ja erityisen pitkäkestoinen: syklisen aikakäsityksen mahdollistava.
* Tuon edellisen osana on kannattavuusanalyysejä terveistä elämäntavoista, tunteista ja työtehosta, mikä mahdollistaisi tunteidenmukaista vapaa-aikaa palkasta tinkimättä, työtehon kasvattamisen myötä, urakkapalkatussa työssä siis http://workandfreetime.blogspot.fi
* Haaveammattiin-blogi: näin opita lahjat ja taidot haaveammattiisi ja vaihdat sosiaalista lokeroa haavealoillesi http://nopeaoppisuus.blogspot.fi
* (Erillinen mutta nyt jo isoksi paisunut projekti kirjata ylös Tervola-nimen myötä tulleita vaikutelmia siitä, miten tauteja ja vaivoja voisi ehkä parantaa: http://parantamisesta.blogspot.fi )
* Lisäksi blogeja aiheista, joista olen harrastunut: taiteet, luonto, liikunta, terveet elämäntavat, vuodenajat, tunteet ja taito, hengellisyydestäkin harrastunut / itämaisesta filosofiasta
"

How to choose what to write to the internet

From my blog http://picturesfrommyhome.blogspot.fi/2018/02/other-links-to-my-texts.html

"14.2.2018   Writing to the internet isn't just figuring out something and then writing it down, as if robbing your ideas from you or trying to fake that all is interesting to others. Instead it sis like coming to think many different thoughts, learning new things, having teaching skills and every now and then coming across something that has rpoduct like good qualities: Hey this is needed by many who are interested in these subjects, and I have the teachings skills for it too, so what about if I would make a blog post about it. And then if the flow of doing carries you too far, coming to think: Hey these are not exactly what is needed but those aree what people need, I will do those and drop these personal ones away."

I cannot widen my texts to new audiences

I have thought of the things thta I write of on a general level, so they apply to all cases I can think of. If they do not apply to some person or group, I am not able to widen them to that group too.
My texts suppose as a compulsory starting level the Finnish school education as it was in the '80's when I went to school. ('78 to '90) I do not have kids of my own, so I am not able to teach the starting leveö of respecting objective thinking, fact communication, basic responsibility and the like.

My cultural environment

I was bprn 1971 and lived my childhood and as teenager and young adult inthe capital district of Finland, which is culturally very academical and work oriented, also inclined toward government and grass-root democracy. I wrote my books there and made most of my videos.
In the summer 2009 I moved to Savonlinna in southern Savo in eastern Finland, which isculturally very different, oriented toward opera, art, summer cottage life, elderly, handiworks,religion, practicaöprofessions, travel and trade plus offering a holiday for the travelleras. First these we just possible areas of life for me but I looked at them from my old culture,maybe for three or four years so. Then during the next four years I have looked things increasingly from the points of view of this new local culture. And right now I came to think that maybe for half a year, since the summer 2017 I have looked at things so much fromthe view of Savonlinna, that my texts already should be classified as products of ways of living in Savonlinna. it's culture and strenghts & weaknesses.

I haven't gotten money from my writing

I haven't been paid anything for my writing work, except together under 30 euros for my text about the far future of computers http://feelingcomputers.blogspot.fi/2011/08/far-future-with-computers-what-will.html , even though many of my texts are of very good quality and needed in the world, which is maybe easiest to notice in my thinking course http://quickerlearning.blogspot.fi . As far as know these are much above the normal Finnish academical skill level in objective thinking skills and very responsible too.

I was not a quick learner in school to begin with

I was not a quick learner in school to begin with, in the first class, maybe on the three first classes, since the things were so new to me, but then got bored of the repetition and technical details, and overly bored in the last years of school, and college after that was just about torture, so mindless it was, when I would have been interested in practical things and art.
If I remember right, school started in the middle of August, and I learned to read in the end of November. My mom used stuck school like ways to think, which maybe slowed my learning, while my own objective ways to think were like philosophy and skilled objective thinking with a picture of the whole, like the natural sciences bbut without experience in their studies.
So I guess that three years of school would have made sense, six years still work out somehow, nine years much too much and twelve years just mindlessly torture like overly much.

What I am like

I have written about the future of computers and about learning thinking skills. So especially children and young people may get lots of influence from me. So what am I like? I was brought up in a very rationally inclined way, both the Finnish culture at the capital, my parents' wishes and their encouragement and my personal strenghts in objectivity. So someone who has learned my thinking course and the basics of what I have written about increasing intelligence, may have quite clear idea of what I am like. I am also responsible like a rational Finnish person ought to be. My personal inclination is toward sports, nature, practical things to do and arts. Of university subject I liked philosophy, biology and geography, even though I did not study them almost at all, except some philosophy courses. I am also interested in teaching talents and in making the world a better place to live in. I am not socially oriented, I have never had close relatoopnships but I am a good member of the society and like hobby pals and older people to learn from. I tend to not to get along with people, especially if I am forced to associated with them, but I have lots of skills to cure situations toward heathier, but I do not usually suicceed all the way to good.

* * *

8th April 2019   As younger I thought social relationships very difficult, since my mom forced me to wear the opposite typeof clothes etc than what I was interested in. So in social relationships I tried to choose the easiest course, which I estimated to be ok instead of superbly good or horribly bad, since bad gets attacks in return and overly nice ought to be of the same kind to get along, both are kind of too much centers of attention for the not so skilled. Getting along with the main current of life in the society, finding room for one'slife in it, trusting the wisest options and using the routes for independent life that the society supports for all, fiding like-minded and being good company oneself, good for the life of the other person and for oneself of course!

About my toys, books, pets as a child

When I was a child, I do not remember how old, I had a black hairy gummy spider and a real lookinh big black gummy "kyy" snike that I once hid in the grasses in our garden and my mom got scared. I also had a maybe 15 cm high plastic sceleton that one can hang in a table lamp and shake to make it kind of dance. It slightly glowed like with phosphor, if one first had it in strong lught and then shut the lamp to be in dark. My mom took it away. When I was 12, we bought from Thailand a snake to that one can pull in a stirng and it had wheels under it's head and a light brown paper tail. My mom liked kind of scientifical or engineering toys like Rubik's cube and we had a similarly working chain of green and light triangles like a snake from which one could form different shapes like a ball etc. We later had the outer shell of a big insect that had grown out of it and changed to a flying insect, it was in a match box.
My mom made made read enermously, first adventure stories which I liked, then Agatha Christies detective novels which she termed usewful for life, and then enermously schence fiction stories which was not so nice and which was harmful for my possibilities of choosing myself what profession to take. She was inclined toward engineering like science and math.
When I was 13, we bought a dog. It was supposed to be a Finnish spitz, but we ended up with a black poodle. But it was very energetic and quite nice. I wanted to become a hair dresser, so I liked ro trim it's coat, and still like such.
Maybe connects to the same that I would have liked to play violin, but my mum and dad arranged me to play a black accordeon. But I like music very much.
I would have liked to become a dnace teacher or a dancer, but my mo did not let me to ballet like other girls did, but later I had traditional Finnish dance as a hobby, but it is just steps and the like, not danced with the whole body like I would have wished. Later my parents made me start Japanese martial art called aikido. Sports suited me but not just aikido.
Before the first class of school begun, I was thought to be so intelligent and responsible that I would noyt need to go to school. But my mom bought me a poster of little singing bird speces called tit, and adults said that because the leader of the school was called Tit by his last name, I should be an eager stiudent in school, just absolute nonsense: those adults would have needed to go to shool and not me! I never fitted into the school, it was just ytoo low level for me and I suffered from it enermously. The Finnish law allows studying by oneself but my mom and dad did not allow.

Me as a writer, somewhat like a journalist

I get from somewhere the styleand way of living that a fiction wrtiter has, but that is not the type of texts that I write, neither is it the way I live. Maybe someone claasified me wrong because of the paradise (It is written purely objectively! http://2013paradise.blogspot.fi/2017/08/basics-of-my-paradise-theory.html) sounds like a novel if not read at all. I write texts to the internet, only fact texts (except some robot stories quite long time ago). It fascinates me that the magnifient things I mention become possible for the reader via reading my text, by teaching them in the text I build a road for better life in a better world. I feel that my niche is in writing texts to the internet a little bit in the style of our local newspaper Itä-Savo which is arts oriented, travel oriented, somewhat religiously inclined and admires the life in the summer cottage. Maybe also somewhat in the style of some magazines. And also some skilled persons, maybe elderly, writing views about subjects of importance objectively but with insight. And writing teaching material for a large audience.
But I just write to the internet, with no wage. I write somewhat like about hobbies but with quality criterions of real work. I am a female writer with academical background in natural sciences and among others an arts hobby.

All my texts are free for all to use morally

All my texts are free for all to use morally according to the traditional Finnish speaking Finnish culture. Their use is not meant to be restricted but they should be used morally, now and in the future.
Usually I do not have safety copies of my texts. So please if you like some text of mine, make a safety copy of it. I have written thousands of pieces of texts to the internet.

Kaisa Hannele Tervola, Savonlinna, Finland, 7th September 2017


* * *

21. May 2019
As younger I thought that someone can earn one's living by writing books, but as I have written myself and looked at the options, books are usually sold roughly at the price of theirprinting costs: paper and ink. In addition there comes post, storage, selling, publisher, possible pictures, unsold copies, advertising and so very little if anything is left for the writer. E-books are an exception to this, but they too would demand an up-to-date computer and right programs, maybe living in the USA. So, as spreading civilized wisdom is the main aim of my texts, they or most of them, according to common sense and Finnish type of moral ("Live and let others line", responsibility, fair play, healthy spirit, good enough common sense with a picture of the whole) are free to use, also publish. For example my text about knitting might interest many, yet I am not so fond of knitting, not that type of (so stupid) person, yet like handicrafts. But if you would like to publish my text as a book or booklet, I would be interested in hearing of it: what, where, for whom, by whom, etc. I would like to get some share of the price of e-books, for example 30%.

26th of September 2019   Come to think of it, I would like to get 1 euro per book, paid when 90% of the copies have been sold, if you publish some of my texts as a book, which is ok if done in a morally ok way.

My areas of life nowadays

Looking around in my home I notice that I do not have so many areas of life nowadays:
music and painting (as interests, but kind of not in tune lately),
two areas of life that I formerly enjoyed but haven't practised lately at all: wilderness guide course and circus with my dogs,
daily things: religion and writing, everyday life with my dogs,
sewing and handicrafts as an interest that I haven't done with so much but what is easy to learn in Savonlinna.
In addition I read a local newspaper of Savonlinna and a women's magazine that offers a kind of more complex view that most magazines, which is a relief.

Unfortunately my forme sports hobby for over ten years is absent, I just walk the dogs in any weather.
In addition an interest in life herein Savo, which is so different from the capital district.

There are other women with roughly the same name as my name

My whole name is Kaisa Hannele Tervola, but I like the name Hannele, so I have for maybe ten years or more called myself Hannele Tervola. But it appears that there are also other women with the name Hannele Tervola.
As a child and young adult I had the last name Hari and then for under two years the name Ekholm and now Tervola for some 12 years.
As a child and young adult I lived in the capital of Finland Helsinki. During that time I spent one year in a farming school in Inkoo quite near Helsinki and weekends in Helsinki. Then lived some 4 years in the neighbouring town Espoo. And now I have lived alomost 8 years in Savonlinna in southern Savo in the eastern Finland.
I was born August 8th 1971 in Helsinki. So I am now 45 years old.
I am a woman. I have never been married or engaged. I do not have children. I have two medium size companion dogs.

Areas I write about

Now, kind of afterwards, I can outline what subject areas I write about:

Objective thinkings skills
Connecting different perspectives
The fate of the world

The relationship of rationality (including thinking, intelligence, talents and skills, wisdom of life, social skills, good ways of doing and work-efficiency and moral) and feelings
Learning talents and skills
Arts, nature
Wisdom of life

(Cure attempts to illnesses, but that is a separate subject, not so objective, written just in case it might be useful)

Finnish culture
Moral
Motion & healthy ways of doing things

My view and kids

My paradise theory handles beautiful values objectively in the context of the whole world, does this with many perspectives and also from the tough war like and work efficiency perspectives and also with computers and technology taken into account.
So when kids at ayoung age build their picture of the world, my view is virtually the upmost in the world, kind of beautiful, with proper objectivity and tough realism, yet in a quite simple form.
http://2013paradise.blogspot.fi

I am a historical person

I am in the context of world history a historically noteworthy woman, a thinker and a writer, maybe classified as a philosopher (theoretical philosophy), because I have written about the future of computers, about how to learn thinking skills and about the possibility of a future paradise.
The future of computers is an importent subject in present day world because computers are such a huge new factor and people wonder what they will develop into. I have written about how to build rationality, moral and feelings to computers, since those are all important to have and those were lacking from the computers. When computers have these characteristics, people will find more room for themselves to live according to the human nature. http://feelingcomputers.blogspot.fi first text of the blog.
The level of understanding is an important factpr determining the outcome of human endeavours. I have written about learning common sense like objective rationality with a good picture of the whole, about developing in intelligence and about the rationality of feelings. http://pikakoulu.blogspot.fi and http://quickerlearning.blogspot.fi
The future paradise that I suggest is healthy ways of living with world at a healthy state, which is the ages old best answer to the question of survival in the tough world, according to the theory of evolution. It is also the same as the paradise in the beginning of time, but this time with the texchnology long. This view could bring cyclic time, so it is a very long term question indeed, for example of an era of 100 000 years and world-wide. http://2013paradise.blogspot.fi and http://paratiisiteoria.blogspot.fi

In addition some might notice especially my texts about curing illnesses http://parantamisesta.blogspot.fi and about recovering from death http://kuolemastajasurusta.blogspot.fi , but those are just impressions (intuition, practical eye and teaching skills together with some thinking skills, communication and social eye), not so sure thoughts like the rest of my texts.

I have written also lot of other subjects. Among other things (as a part of the paradise theory) about feelings in working life, see the book at http://workandfreetime.blogspot.fi .

I also would like to translate Finnish oetry to English, since I feel that it is wise and has wisdom of life that could cure the world.
http://EinoLeinopoems.blogspot.fi/
http://finnishskills.blogspot.fi/2016/09/about-kalevala.html

2.7.2017  Birds might consider also my text about humans singing spring historically noteworthy
http://musiikkipaivakirja.blogspot.fi/2017/04/tunnelman-inspiroima-laulu.html
For young birds' ability to survive outside the nest I think that the ability to learn to fly well is very important (but this text is in Finnish) http://tunteetjatekemisentapa.blogspot.fi/2017/05/linnunpoikasten-lentamaan-oppimisesta.html

Maybe also writing about the Finnish culture brings valuable Finnish wisdom available in the world
http://opisuomalaisuus.blogspot.fi
http://Finnishskills.blogspot.fi
But on the other hand I have written many somehow noteworthy texts, mainly pieces of advice, for example about sewing clothes without formulae, only one's dream as a guide
http://tunteetjatekemisentapa.blogspot.fi/2016/03/vaatteiden-ompelemisesta-ilman-kaavoja.html

How much work I get done by writing

A few years ago I was continually thinking of what job I could get. So I couldn't help noticing that when I wrote a sort piece of something, that was often a so big idea that it could have brought content to whole lifetime's work, or for the remaining 20 or 25 years or working life. So I continued writing. Now still I am amazed how many such pieces I have written, typically from one to a few in a day, and that is an enormous amount of work, ideas, compared to what I could have contributed in an ordinary job. So I have still contyinued writing, even though I feel that I do not have much left unsaid, if anything. (It is like this with most of my texts but the cure suggestions to illnesses are just impressions, not sure skills.)

Pictures from my home

Pictures from my home & some textin Finnish:
See http://savolaisuudesta.blogspot.fi/2016/09/kuvia-kotoani.html

Here some of them (not in time order):

(a view from the window)

* * *

12.3.2018 Pictures from my home nowadays http://picturesfrommyhome.blogspot.fi/

My texts have no sources, they are my own thoughts

Just about everything in my texts is my own observations siad in a way that is thought of from the point of view of teaching. I have not read them from anywhere, I have not been taught them in any way. I have just been interested in things that increase intelligence, like zen buddhist books, Stephen Mitchell's English translation of Tao-Te-Ching, arts and New Age books, also in healthy ways of living, the nature and animals, sports and moral and in building apicture of the world for myself.

Intelligence differencies are largely not inborn

I have the impression that I do not have a larger capacity than what others in Finland would have the potential capacity to. Thinking ability is build largely on basic areas of life like looking, feeling, getting social impressions,having likings, moving etc. My impression is that the difference in intelligence may be due to differencies in ordinary visul environments as a baby, since my parents values the nature and especially trees and little birds, which might be a typical characteriustic of how I look at structures and rythms, while some other tend to conceive them as if they had watched kitchen wall and some sitting people, or the like, so their interest in structures is tuned to less complex and less landscape like and rythms, areas of life etc different too. Another difference is in others doing some task like thinking or seeing and then adding to that some extra thing they are fond of and so losing the original skill level in the percpetion and ending up with something much less landscape like, much more short-sighted. So the others think that they have extra capacity and time to use to some differemnt miussion, while I was fond of just watching and doing practical concretical things, so my concretical landscape like thinking ability stayed like in the perception while they lost it without any great difference in capacity.

Trees are good in that they are alive, complex structured wholes, there is a lot to look at in them, their parts have atmosphere and emotional style interwined with their form, the way they have grown, they are healthy wholes, they have idea in how they grow, they live in circumstancies but find their way freely in them in a healthy natural ages old wise way that one can compare to human life, trees from the same climate teach good ways of living in that climate, they healthy and good models so for life, they have lots of variation but symmetries too, they teach to look at landscapes, their have both details and a magnifient looking whole, they look different in different weather and ytime of the day, one can learn wisdom from them, one can learn to healthy ways of living to those ages old ways of living that are best for humans for reaching happiness, full capacity and a good wise understanding of the world.

The intelligence level I write to

I write to the intelligence level of a somwhat stupid but not very stupid academical person or to what I estimate people in the capital district of Finland in their early twenties would all or most understand about a subject that they are not much familiar with but that they are sincerely interested in. So I do not write to my own level of intelligence, but more like to the lower end of what I am able to communicate to. So my thoughts often have wide areas of applications, look quite simple but may be complex to think through all the roads I have thougt about them
I read the Chinese classic about learning masterful skill Tao-Te-Ching (Stephen Mitchell's translation) for years trying to learn teaching skills, so that I could teach the solution that I find to many others too, and that they would find those skills from themselves with the help of my teaching, instead of just reading robot like.

About how I learned good quality thinking as a child

My parents were very theoretically inclined, enthusiastic about science and math but not intelligent and not good at practical things. I always longed for concretical practical world, for practical things like in household tasks with children, gardening, life at the summer cottage, wondering at the beauty and amazing structures of nature, practical professions, physical work, sports, trade, maybe police's work. So I was keen at looking, very interested to see and experience things of the world, everyday life things with their multitude of characteristics, structures, practical uses, behaviour, feelings etc. And my mother was always interested in tiniest observations too since she was not so good at making observations herself, so I kind of learned to pay attention to things well when I looked at them, and to live ina  landscape of environement and life in it. So I learned practical common sense like objective thinking but not so much practical skills because my parents always wanted to take everything theoretically.

* * *

British aren't considered so very wise and they start school at the age of 5. Finns are wise and have wisdom and life. Finns start school at the age of 7. I read today about a famous old Finnish poet. He wanted to start school when he was 8 but was considered too young to start school until he was 9. His poetry is very wise indeed, and the old times give an impression of greater wisdom. Do Asians start something school like at very young age? Buddhism is described somewhat like one could describe one's own understanding about life and about how to live to someone who has studied only school like things starting at a young age. Years before school shoudl teach life skills and high capacity, reach high, so that when one starts school one's own understanding is kind of equal tyo things taught in school: one just knows them in addition. We has at least playing, painting, being read tales, doing practical things, discussing, going to places and doing things together, being outdoors and with the nature, some songs too.
If I remember right, I started piano lessons at the age of 7 when I started school too, since my mom thoguht that such is good for intelligence and wisdom.

How to reach for good quality

I think that my guest for better quality is important in learning new things and in keeping quality good and thoughts profound. When I do something with some quality, I do not think, well, this is enough, but often think how good the quality should ideally have been for my life and the society and the world to go well, spend a moment or two wondering what it would demand, what kind of extra job and mark for myself that I would some time in the future do that extra job while associating with a subject like this. So my quality does not deteriorate due to laziness as easily but neither do I get much extra work. Some maybe I read some interesting magazine articles for a half an hour in a month as a result of this or so, and think some things more thoroughly which for me goes quite quickly.

My favourite books in childhood

Vanhoja seikkailu- ja eläinsatuja luin nuorempana innolla
Bel-Ria
Nopsajalka
Thowra hopeaharja
Uljas musta
Robin Hood
Kaapparikapteeni
Monte Criston kreivi
Kolmen muskettisoturin jatko-osat
Arsene Lupinin seikkailut
Erämaan kasvatti

My writing work is done (2/2016, 4/2018, 6/2020, 6/2021)

I started writing in the autumn 1998. Now in the beginning of 2016 I cannot think of more subjects that I would need to write about. I have already written everything responsibility demands me to write. That makes 17,5 years of writing, huh! Maybe I will still be adding something smaller, but right now I do not have anything more to write. The last year I have written mostly about the seasons.

17.4.2018   I have still been writing, largely adding new pieces that seem to be needed and that are quite easy to make with my skills. Lately that has largely been teaching skills and cure attempts to diseases. This spring the flow of writing hasn't been carrying like earlier though, but more like out of tune, not so good quality, but I do not know if that means the writing work is coming to an end. For the last few years my thinking has been fuelled by what I learned about painting, especially about painting tree branches, kind of have found a wiser viewpoint, a wiser approach that way. I have no iudea what to continue to if my writing years end. What I write nowadays are still needed additions and link recommendations to my texts. Some translations are missing.

19.6.2020   I have had a some kind of pause in writing skills and lack of skills at large since the last Sunday of May 2020, which is almost three weeks ago, and then it was 21 years 9months and two weeks since my interest in farming was somehow overrun by the need to write, first my final work in farming school's one year course and then my final work in university and then about beneficality grounds for moral and about the future of the world with öarge systems and then my books, 1000 videos and during the last ten years here in savonlinna my tens of blogs. Now I feel that I am not attached to writing anymore, but since the time has been so long, I am at loss where to continue. On the other hand, it has been quite typical that if I am some day somehow stupidified, I do not feel the need to write, but sometimes I do write anyway since the habit is so strong: daily for over 20 years.

6th of June 2021   For the last year and some months I have had some influence that brings stupidity. Now I have come to think that there is no longer anything of outmost importance thst I ought to write about. So I guess that writing is just one job option for me now, but I haven't been paid for writing, so I guess that it does not work out. Lately I have wtitten almost solely the long text Skills of Christmas gnomes learntalents.blogspot.com .

Some facts about me

I do not know if these matter, but I mention them just in case.
I am an absolutist: I never drink alcohol and do not use drugs and dislike the idea of needing medicines. I like sports, nature, practical things to do, moral, feelings and healthy ways of living.

In the capital district people who knew me typically said to me that I am the most rational person they have ever met and maybe the most responsible too. When I was younger and went to school, people who knew me said that was and was already to begin with the kind of person to which school aims to raise young people to: thinking with my own brains and carrying responsibility like an adult should. In school I typically got the highest grades: typically 9 or 10 in almost evrything. When I graduated from school, my average was (after 12th grade)  9.5 (9.7 after 9th grade)and I wrote 5 laudaturs. But I did not value school very much, since I already could those things, my parents taught such at home since they were overly interested in science. I myself like sports, the nature, animals, wisdom of life and moral, and practical things to do and arts.

Already in my mother's stomach as a small start I was maybe more intelligent, more common sense like rational and more healthily inclined than her, who was academically inclined and had liked school very much. That was mostly because she thought of the start of a baby as an animal like being who should learn from animals and the trees etc if one only can in stomach but maybe one can from there somehow conceive the world.

My mom and dad were less intelligent than me and my brother, so they taught us almost solely things that they had read from books, since their own attemps were almost always much less skilled than mine, and I guess that also less skilled than my brother's.

My mom has had since she was a small child a nickname that has the assosiation "Look!" and she was always showing us things: "Look at this!", "Look, what is here!" and of things to think about "Can you see how it goes? I am not sure.". Thta was in the style of naturaö sciences, school and liking the nature.

I was about 20 years without tv. I had studies that I did not like at all and considered it unbearble to go to studies, then sit at home watching tv and then go to studies again unendingly. I preferred to go out in the evenings to my hobbies and the like. Besides, I did not have at all enough money for the tv fee. Instead I listened a lot to the radio, mostly pop songs in the local radio City. Nowadays I watch from the tv mostly news and don't like anything that has actors.
I was also for a very long time without a newspaper, because it was much too expensive, but I read the free papers available and whenever there was Helsingin Sanomat or whatever newspaper available somewhere for free I read them.

My parents were atheists and forbid strictly Christianity from me. But I had a liking for religion and a need for philosophy of life. People considered me suited to being Christian but never gave me the chance, propably because I am by character one who takes things seriously, with heart too and moral, so I kind of looked religious without it being religion. People used to tell me that they would like to be atheists. In my 20s my mom brought to me books about Zen Buddhism and the book Tao-Te-Ching in English and I read them and across the years learned something about Buddhism and Taoism, i.e. Asian wisdom anout happiness and skill, which though is not a religion. Later on I have been interested in Christianity.

I have studied 18 and a half years: 9 + 3 years of school, 5 years of university, 1 year in farming school and half a year on a wilderness guide course.

Lately, for some years now I have read mainly only two magazines (women's magazine MeNaiset and local daily newspaper Itä-Savo) and internet news.

I have never been much interested in moving to live abroad. Of all the countries of the world I would have chosen just Finland, because I enjoy Finnish ways of living, the Finnish nature, the Finnish climate and the Finnish culture with it's good sides about what the society, moral and social relationships and life are like. I am somewhat interested in travel though, but have not travelled much. I have been interested in Eastern Finland all my life, but as I live in eastern Finland it is not like I was told, and I was originally from the capital district and am somewhat interested in the whole Finland. I also want to know about other cultures, countries and climates.

In school I was the best pupil of my class for maybe roughly half of the school time. In the ordinary school my final grades were 9,7 on average (and 9,9 on academical type of school subjects). Fron college I wrote five laudaturs year 1990 and my average grades were 9,5 on the ordinary scale from 4 to 10 .
Before I entered school at the ordinary age of seven, it was thought that I would not need to go to school since I was so rational and responsible myself. But to learn to read and write I was entered school in the ordinary way. And I never felt the need for going to school. It was just a burden, especially because I have so poor memory that I cannot just leisurely sit and still remember everything. I suffered very much from going to school. There absolutely is a need to take into account the differencies in intelligence, upbringing and responsibility, to take them into account in common sense like ways, fairly toward the kid.

I was raised in the capital of Finland Helsinki ja my parents said they were Finnish and so they always spoke Finnish in daily life and sometimes somehwat clumsy English with foreigners. They taught me Finnish culture but as teenager and young adult I was surprised at how little they in practise followed it. Lately (I am now over 40 years old) I have watched in the internet some videos about Russian places. My father always had the style of Novosibirsk town in western Siberia in Russia. Maybe he (or many men from there) was from there or an admirer of the place, even though he never talked about it. And my mom was an admirer of Chinese working life, but the style I most remember about her is of Irkutsk city in central Siberia in Russia. But sometimes she reminded me of some other countries too by her style - maybe it were across the years several women fond of Chinese workers and liking men from Novosibirsk?

21.6.2023   My step mother like mother was always called by her nickname, never mother or the like. The police and people around said that since she does not follow the values and skill levels expected from a mom, she should not be called a mom. Likewise my father was nearly always called by his nickname.