Siirry pääsisältöön

Vigorous instead of soft

 My texts are largely of the subject rationality of feelings. That means objective thinking of at least school level or higher. It does not mean neglecting any criterions of objectivity or any parts of an objective picture of the world. If there are problems in applying, one should demand better quality in objectivity. 

But I have come across many social or society level problems which might be, at least partly, results of some misunderstandings in to whom my blogs, books and booklets are aimed at. I am 52 years old, so these surely aren't aimed at my childhood relatives, school class mates, etc. These are mostly blogs in the internet, meant for objectively thinking responsible individuals who follow civiliced values and are interested in the subjects of the texts, which means supporting such values, not sabotaging such. My texts being mostly at a very general level means just that the point of view is theoretical, not restricted to a certain person, culture, climate, etc. It does not mean that the texts would suit all. So it is not like tv for example. Especially my texts do not suit those who do not always follow at least school level objective thinking. My own education was in theoretical physics, or that was the way of thinking I learned in the university, after school that is, so I do not understand why many of my readers seem to be of the care professions, not undersranding the difference of a thought or magic. 

So it seems that some try to read my texts as if without the word "rationality" in the description of the subject. So they would like to change to something soft, to eating bakery, sleeping, or nurses, or wish from the winter something such, or demand the heat of summer days in the warm countries, or just lazying, being social, without any need for skills, or murders, cannibalism, replacing people by humanoid robots, knives, drugs, macabre things, trying so solve things away by fake claims, social nonsense, liars, actors, engineers, by trying to overrun the need for professions, practical life, civiliced culture, good future for the living kind etc. 

While my texts are from the point of view of the biological picture of humans, feeling like vigorous, well working action, wise in the world, good for life, with high skills, and wisdom of life, with enough peace and safety precautions for the working life and civiliced society, with wisdom of life taken into account, and the experience of life with common sense and healthy ways. 


Kommentit

Lähetä kommentti

Tämän blogin suosituimmat tekstit

My birthday and my childhood name

My birthday is 8. of August. As numbers 8.8. it brings to my ming four round circle like things of which two pairs are more closely connected. The healthy round forms bring to my mind symbiosis and a model of the world. So it is like one form of my paradise theory. I have not noticed it having influenced my thinking, except that I have come to notice the possibility of such a model and on the other hand my childhood environment maybe saw such a view as part of what I might be like because of my birthday. Late summer is also a time of warmth at the same time with the need to defend the good things summer brings, the loves in one's life from the coming autumn and winter. So that too may have affected my view on what is the task of thinking, theory and work. * * * (7. March 2016 As a child I had the last name Hari, so my name Kaisa Hari bought the associations "keisari" = emperor and "tsaari" = Russian tsar (emperor). So I took it to my task to cultivate some...
Lähetä kommentti
Lue lisää

Each one has a different view of skills etc

 Some day last week I on some mental side talked momentarily with someone who had read my book A Sorcerer, and it was as if she knew it well, but even though she appeared inclined toward rational style life, she did not seem interested in the skills taught in the book, so her version of such was very far from mine. Yet my experience is that many social relations oriented people refer to the more rationally oriented in getting a kind of schooled view, so even those go much further from the original. And these are who are claimed to be of roughly the same type and same skills as the writer, while others left more far away in views, which seems that either they caught nothing of the communication or then there was some similarity, for example a hobby like interest in the subjects shared with the writer, which brought the clmmunication. So even though one can tell of skills, for example to look detailedly at some points, the level of actually living one's life is very different. It doe...
Lähetä kommentti
Lue lisää

A video: "Rescued lion with a turtle nest on it's back"

 A video: "Rescued lion with a turtle nest on it's back" I have written a lot. Thoughts are the task of the one thinking, instead of only the task of some forefigure or original thinker in the subject. Thoughts are not that much collective. You must build your own picture of the world yourself, I cannot command what to think. I feel that I have stayed in this subject so long that many others just refuse to think, as if it were my task to carry them. One should try to notice when one is under the lowest level ok for living beings or the like, and not suppose such laziness in thinking to be ok.  In my twenties Practised aikido in the aikido association of the University of Helsinki. I also looked if I could find a boyfriend and a spouce. Axter I had interrupted my studies in the university, I after two years went to a year long course in a Swedish speaking farming school quite near the capital district. After that it was not so easy to continye aikudo. Once I went to anothe...
Lähetä kommentti
Lue lisää