Already as a child some thought that I have a very high position since I am objective and seek to be moral. On the other hand that has not given me any high position that I would have noticed. Across the years I have every now and then wondered what that misunderstanding is, but only now that I am almost 50 and have written I guess most of what I write in my lifetime, I have some clearer view of it. My childhood environment was very much centered on objective thinking, likewise the university of Helsinki when I was a young adult, so that they looked at this from the point of view of pbjective thinking as almost everybopdy's profession, and then they just classified objective thinking of high generality and good quality as something to value when learning objective thinking and forming an objective picture of the world. Now that I have written a lot, it means that so inclined people could refer to some text of mine saying that it is good to study or just read it if one is interested in a certain subject in one's objectuve picture of the world, or in learning certain skills. When I was younger I had not yet written my view, and so young persons get often classified by theor potential, saqying that one ought to ask for theoir view on something. But as older people do not have such hierargies, since they are often tired and one ought just read what they have written. But this interests only people interested in learning objective thinking, and for other professions it is like someone saying taht if you are interested in that subject, you could read certain good quality texts about it. Likewise about learning skills: my texts seekj to teach skills and talents, and so they could be valued likewise.
* * *
22.12.2020 Writing has been my work without pay for some 22 years, first in my final works and then writing my books, and it was a big difference to my studies in practical agriculture, in which I would have liked to continue. But writing has in practice been my job, so I have professionals kills to it, and in it is typical that others do not share the same expertice, but in the other hand journalists seem to be of roughly the same or similar caliber, maybe not all but their work is similar. With others I associate like individuals as parts of the civiliced society, and in that all do not need to share the same skill level but all ought to behave in ways fit into the society or otherwise there comes problems and to get along one ought to have same values, likings, quite similar skill level, etc.
* * *
26th of June 2021 I tend to run into people being aggressive and malivious and I do not quite know why. One guess is that they do not compare right the scales of my thinking work and their own job or hobbies and that they do not quite understand that in big influencies one beeds to follow filigently very good objective and moral quality all the time, also on free time. My thinking and writing work is as widest in the scale ofvthr fste oh the humannkind anf of the living kind along with it, which is some 7 billion people and st lobgedt guess 100 000 years to the guture, so that the scale difference really is huge to the scale of one or a few persons, in which there is the diffe0rence that people often don't golow moral in it, at least notvdo much.
* * * *
9th of November 2022 My both parents were sientists and university professors. Now they sre retired, but my stepmother may have an enermous number of female admirers all over the world and engineering students as admirers, since she had a fine tens of years long career in science. I on the other hand was much more intelligent in university kind of objective thinking and much more responsible chsracter but without formal position. According to my knowledge internet writing is free for all but has certain rules like for example following laws, so my possibility to write blogs on a free international blogging site is not any formal position but instead ooen to all who follow rules, laws, moral, good quality, etc diligently.
Kommentit
Lähetä kommentti