I guess that I would classify as a writer who has some own insight into things. I write advices in learning skills and talents. I try to write so that my texts would as a side effect also solve social and society level tangles, so that my texts could be a positive influence to the readers' lives but that is via taught skills and maybe via the approach, and not influence from my own life which at least nowadays is writing oriented life in a dangerous district and with some enemies too.
26th of March 2020 I am not an influential writer, since I feel that these subjects often cause opposition or neglecting them. Neither am I socially influential. But I am a good thinker. My input is that of a thinker and a writer of teaching material, largely around the subject of rationality of feelings, always objectively. I do not write about my own life, at least mostly not at all, but I write about learning talents in daily life and that often has some taste of free time life.
I have grown up without giving up the ideals and values I had as younger and without giving up the school and university skills either. In my view the different perspectives fit well together without there being any need of neglecting one while concentrating on the other. But it often happens that I cannot decide all things in my life, and so lately my ways of living haven't been as healthy as when I was younger, the town is just so different.As 45 years and older, for the last three years has my thinking ability been lower some part of the time, kind of varied. Some years ago I stopped panting and that was somehow not good for eyesight, which too varies, I do not know why, maybe panting is wrong group to identify with.
4th of May 2020 My texts are not meant to be a course in how to be like me. I tend to pay attention to complex things but write about them in a simple yet objectuvely correct waysince such is a good way to teach such things. My texts are picked from my objectuive picture of the world to be basic skills that are needed in life and that are generally useful in one's picture of the world and in one's skills. What I am like is another thing, connected to what suits my endurancy, my likings, my values and my situations of life, and such has typically been very unflexible, for example I suffered from school and for many jobs I do not have the endurancy, even though when I have enough freedom I do understand quite a lot about work endurancy but that demands free choices and good possibilities for life.
26th of March 2020 I am not an influential writer, since I feel that these subjects often cause opposition or neglecting them. Neither am I socially influential. But I am a good thinker. My input is that of a thinker and a writer of teaching material, largely around the subject of rationality of feelings, always objectively. I do not write about my own life, at least mostly not at all, but I write about learning talents in daily life and that often has some taste of free time life.
I have grown up without giving up the ideals and values I had as younger and without giving up the school and university skills either. In my view the different perspectives fit well together without there being any need of neglecting one while concentrating on the other. But it often happens that I cannot decide all things in my life, and so lately my ways of living haven't been as healthy as when I was younger, the town is just so different.As 45 years and older, for the last three years has my thinking ability been lower some part of the time, kind of varied. Some years ago I stopped panting and that was somehow not good for eyesight, which too varies, I do not know why, maybe panting is wrong group to identify with.
4th of May 2020 My texts are not meant to be a course in how to be like me. I tend to pay attention to complex things but write about them in a simple yet objectuvely correct waysince such is a good way to teach such things. My texts are picked from my objectuive picture of the world to be basic skills that are needed in life and that are generally useful in one's picture of the world and in one's skills. What I am like is another thing, connected to what suits my endurancy, my likings, my values and my situations of life, and such has typically been very unflexible, for example I suffered from school and for many jobs I do not have the endurancy, even though when I have enough freedom I do understand quite a lot about work endurancy but that demands free choices and good possibilities for life.
Kommentit
Lähetä kommentti