Books about the rationality of feelings and sexuality

I have written about the value of feelings and instincts in working life, from the point of view that feelings help to achieve best performance for any work, best capacity and skill. nd that following instincts like sexuality, sense of beauty and the need for social life is similarly useful. My blog http://workandfreetime.blogspot.fi introduces these to working life, giving a chance for much more free time with a full time wage on the condition that free time is fully according to feelings and along the lines of healthy natural ages old ways of living on all areas of life. On a link from that blog is my book Theory of Sexuality, or is it named Hard rationality oif feelings and instincts in that version. It is mostly about the value of feelings in working life but uses that understanding to explain the value of sexual affairs for working life too.
My book "Tough Power Benefit Calculations About Sex & Women" http://www.angelfire.com/planet/paradisewins/TPBCASAW.pdf adds to that book the value of moral from the point of view of beneficiality and examines the thus built picture of the world which suggests that a moral paradise is economically and militarily the best option.
My thick books "Year 2013: Technologized nature paradise" and "2013: Paradise like era" are collections of my texts and include both books about the value of feelings and sexuality. The first book is s part of the second one.

Many of my blogs have thousand views or more

Blogeistani näköjään luokkaa tuhat tai yli kävijöitä on viidellätoista. Monella tosin ihan vain kymmenen tai kaksikymmentä katselukertaa. Jätin joukkoon muutaman kiinnsotavan vähemmän katsotun.
Hannele

Bloggerin hallintapaneeli
Käyttäjän Kaisa Hannele Tervola blogit

Akvarellimaalauspäiväkirjani ja maalaamisen oppimisen ohjeita
Näyttökertakaavio 1703 sivun katselua - 105 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 20.10.2015

Omia vaikutelmiani parantamisesta ja parantumisesta
Näyttökertakaavio 1162 sivun katselua - 131 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 19.10.2015

Paratiisiteoria käytännössä
Näyttökertakaavio 903 sivun katselua - 57 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 15.10.2015

Healthily Moral: Why and How in practise
Näyttökertakaavio 1396 sivun katselua - 43 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 12.10.2015

Learn the skills of Finns!!
Näyttökertakaavio 651 sivun katselua - 12 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 12.10.2015

Näin opit suomalaisuuden!
Näyttökertakaavio 1063 sivun katselua - 22 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 12.10.2015

Luku- ja kirjoitustaitoiset sirkuskoirat
Näyttökertakaavio 3592 sivun katselua - 224 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 12.10.2015

Quicker Learning in School: All school in one year - An attempt!
Näyttökertakaavio 118 sivun katselua - 3 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 12.10.2015

More free time!!!
Näyttökertakaavio 1007 sivun katselua - 22 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 12.10.2015 - 1 seuraaja

Kuolleista herättämisen ohje, yritelmä vain - (sekä varhempia ajatelmiani kuolemasta ja surusta)
Näyttökertakaavio 702 sivun katselua - 35 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 12.10.2015

Yksinäisille elämänohjeita
Näyttökertakaavio 1734 sivun katselua - 46 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 26.9.2015

PIKAKOULU: "koko koulu yhdessä vuodessa" AIHIO Opi hyvä ajattelukyky ja äly helposti!
Näyttökertakaavio 3907 sivun katselua - 55 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 25.9.2015

Musiikkipäiväkirja ja musikaalisuuden oppimisen ohjeita
Näyttökertakaavio 1671 sivun katselua - 127 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 22.9.2015

Well Working Tips for Happy Life
Näyttökertakaavio 1072 sivun katselua - 36 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 3.9.2015

Alanvaihto haaveammattiin! : Näin opit lahjat ja taidot kaukaiselle haavealallesi!
Näyttökertakaavio 4992 sivun katselua - 21 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 30.8.2015

Future Computers: Feelings and Moral For Computers
Näyttökertakaavio 1622 sivun katselua - 28 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 5.7.2015

2013 Paradise Era bought by user-friendly and environment-friendly technology
Näyttökertakaavio 985 sivun katselua - 5 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 20.3.2014

Intelligence
Näyttökertakaavio 933 sivun katselua - 6 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 19.4.2013

 * * *

Pe 23.10.2015
Jos tuosta nyt huomaisi sen, että monella blogillani on tuhatkunta katselukertaa tai ylikin, niin se kertoo tästä kirjoittamisen tavasta. Vaikka osa blogeistani on päiväkirjoja, niin keskityn kertomaan montaa kiinnostavista asioista eikä henkilökohtaisia asioita. Jos ottaa esimerkiksi vaikka yhden viimeisimmistä blogikirjoituksistani http://akvarelliblogini.blogspot.fi/2015/10/tiistaina-20-lokakuuta-2015.html niin kirjoitin siitä, miten aloittelija voisi oppia maalaamaan vaimonsa muotokuvan näillä ohjeilla (muuta itse olen nainen) tai hevosen (eri ikä, en ole hevosharrastaja) tai jostakin tunnelmallisesta näkyvästä pitävä ei-taidetta-harrastava, joskus vain taidenäyttelyssä käyvä, näkymän koskettavuuden voimalla paremmalla taidolla esim. tuollaisen muotokuvan (ja itse olen maalausharrastaja, ollut muutaman vuoden ja miettinyt maalaamisesta ammattia itselleni). Eli vaikka aiheet voivat olla tunteita koskettavia, niin ne eivät ole henkilökohtaisia vaan monelle yhteisiä yleisesti kiinnostavia asioita, joista olen jotakin olennaista osannut neuvoa.

Whom I do not copy from

I guess that besides from copying skills from wild animals, I also to a large extend do not have some very usual forefigures.

I have never copied from actors, never wanted to learn acting. I think that acting creates a mess. It removes safety nets, makes you vulnerable to pressure and hides these disasters from sight. Besides, joy and happiness in lfe come from you living life according to your own nature and if you even hide your expressions or pretend to be like somebody else, you go numb, unfeeling at that part of your life. Also skills demand that you do things in practise and not just pretend, since typically skills are not difficult for most but do demand that certain things are really done with quality. Also social relationships are rewarding if your true self associates with the true friendly selves of others according to the rule "Live and let others live", and if you only pretend these you end up in a soup of chores and obligations instead of free life in contact with others.

I also never have admired technology and engineers. Instead I consider them more stupid than others. It is just that engineering does not have much to say, so the people from other areas of life feel stupid when they associate with engineering and do not have much to say. Common sense is much better! Arts and religions are where you can find intelligence plus in healthy natural life and good moral.

I never copied from evil deeds and from devil like persons, since they appeared engineer like and short-sighted in my eyes, also disastrous for the society and the future.

In sexual affairs I never wanted to change to be just like that other person, not even as young. Also when I admire someone or some skill, I do not admire so much as to want to change my way of living. Instead I try to find the best ways of living for me and adopt them.

I never copied food oriented things from those who did not have healthy well working and happy ways of living. For example I did not as a kid admire the fat ones or especially wait for meals or candy. As a teenager I was not interested in alcohol and I stil don't drink. I think that drinking postpones making needed corrections. It also causes one to copy from those moments when relaxedness was not of one's own doing, and so one ends up being tense. It also colours positive things as something caused by drunkenness and so removes them from seriously taken alternatives, from seriously taken good things in the world.

I have just about never played with dolls as a child. I had some furry animal dolls though and I played a little bit with them. But I was much more interested in little singing birds, ants and later in our own pets: fisr aquarium fishes, then mice and hamster and when I was 13 we bought a black energetic miniature poodle puppy boy. One can learn wild animals' skills by looking at them and being social: their keen eyes, sporty movement, social life in the middle of everyday action, even pondering about life. And one learns normal social ways from them: to be observant, to take others' actions into account and not treating them like a dead artifact, like one playing with dolls, and letting them be what they are in character, situation of life, skills, feelings etc, thinsg done, and not putting imagination on top of that like one playing with dolls does wrong to real beings.

I mostly haven't watched tv. As a child my parents had a negative attitude toward tv and tried to keep it to a minimum of evening news, sometimes some documents and not much else. Later on I thought that free time hobbies and pals were what I needed and not sitting the evenings watching tv alone, so I didn't have a tv. It was so for some 20 years. Now for a few years I have had tv but haven't had the habit of watching it almost at all. But I used to listen to radio a lot, mostly music and news.

My mom was not very friendly, caring or wise. She was much like a step mother. Neither was my father so wise, friendly or caring. So I did not copy from them anything, especially not very much needed basic things in life.

I do not watch TV almost at all. When I was a child my parents opposed watching tv. School demanded that kids should watch tv, so we watched some tv. But when I at the age of 21 moved to live on my own I did not have tv. Nowadays I have tv but I do not have the habit of watching it at all, so mostly, typically for weeks or months I do not watch it at all and even when I watch it is only a short piece, an attempt. The effect of watching tv is not benefical on my life, it somehow disturbs my daily life the same day and on the following day.

When I was school age and older our family had a paid cleaning woman to take care of cleaning. My dad cooked most meals. My mom was like a stepmom and had a career as a scientist, which she placed above just about everything else. Also my dad was a scientist. 

About my relationship to moral

As a kid when I tried to understand what work is and what it is needed for, I kind of thought that doing something useful that some others want to pay for and that a society is a kind of sum of the work done plus similarly free time activities' sum. So I kind of though that the idea in doing work is to make the world a better place to live in. On the other hand money is an important motivation for work, so this view does not taste like moral, more like selfishness.
But when I come across something that handles moral, I typically like it. I like that people have feelings, that they understand the world also emotionally which I take to be a part of a full understanding. I also like that there is some idea in doing things, that it makes sense for the world, for life. I also like that there are good possibilities in a society for good life: just make your choises, what kind of life you want, what kinds of things to do, to aasociate with and that's your work, those are your hobbies, your life in the society, just go and enjoy it!

What I have read

As a kid I read adventure books which I liked very much, the ordinary children's (mostly boys' plus about animals) adventures and from knights to animals and indians. I also read detective novels which I did not like so much. I read also many cartoon books like Lucky Luke. Later my parents forced me to read science fiction novels but I did not like the people in them. Later I read some fantacy books and liked the practical life in them. I also read as a young adult New Age books which I liked very much (especially about Zen Buddhism, Chinese classic Tao-Te-Ching translated by Stephen Mitchel and Carlos Castaneda's books). Around then I read John Steinbeck's books (about farming and practical life) and poetry which I liked very much. (This was in the capital. Now I have moved to Savo.) Lately I haven't read so much, mainly the local newspaper Itä-Savo (from which I copy, i.e. learn some things about skills and local life, and women's magazine MeNaiset which I do not copy from).

Feelings have it right

I have written here on my blogs and on the links from tehre, many thoughts that go fully according to feelings. That aren't thought running wild. Instead it is largely a question of feeling understanding things right and being able to interprete feelings to thoughts.
More exactly it is feelings and atmosphere impressions. It has much to do with being honest, with not mixing imagination or lies to one's perceptions. I also don't replace the perception by words or some predetermined thought structure. Instead I use common sense and everyday perceptions with feelings, social feelings, life situations etc. I use a landscape like view of the world, so I do not err to tunnel sightedness. I also know that each thing brings to my mind many perceptions and many associations and I observe them all, without dropping parts away. I set them all one by one to be parts of my picture of the world, each in it's own size class and own context. (If you find it difficult to see so many things or to associate so many things, read novels, amybe listen music in the radio too.) I leave the observations there with the atmosphere they had naturally. So I do not make a new kind of lied marking but leave the perceptions untouched, so that they are as sure as possible and I can from thew original atmosphere know what kind of truth it is or whom I heard it from and what kind of talk was that. To these I add from my objective picture of the world remarks of why this might well be so, like following feelings often brings strenght compared to neglecting feelings and so also some basic need which causes weakness as a result.

See also http://tunteetjatekemisentapa.blogspot.fi/2014/10/tunteiden-tuomasta-ymmarryksesta-jarjen.html

The thinking type used here you can learn at http://quickerlearning.blogspot.fi 

My birthday and my childhood name

My birthday is 8. of August. As numbers 8.8. it brings to my ming four round circle like things of which two pairs are more closely connected. The healthy round forms bring to my mind symbiosis and a model of the world. So it is like one form of my paradise theory. I have not noticed it having influenced my thinking, except that I have come to notice the possibility of such a model and on the other hand my childhood environment maybe saw such a view as part of what I might be like because of my birthday.
Late summer is also a time of warmth at the same time with the need to defend the good things summer brings, the loves in one's life from the coming autumn and winter. So that too may have affected my view on what is the task of thinking, theory and work.

* * *

(7. March 2016
As a child I had the last name Hari, so my name Kaisa Hari bought the associations "keisari" = emperor and "tsaari" = Russian tsar (emperor). So I took it to my task to cultivate some of the good sides that people need to have to be good or at least worthy emperors, but I did not connect that to the emperor of China but to rulers of vast areas in general. At the same time I valued grass roots democracy in the Finnish way and not kingdoms as forms of government, much less empires.)
(24. August 2016
I did not have some role or ways of behaviour emperor like, not even sometimes. Instead I thought of emperors as persons who arrange things that people in wide areas need, who find solutions to difficult problems on wide areas of the nation and do that via thinking, discussing, understanding the world, cultures, different types of people, how they interact, what they need and how to arrange such, etc. So I thought of the position of an emperor like an ordinary citizen who in some task deserves well such a high position, negotiating about the affairs of the state. But emperor managing to do that more often, solve problems, negotiate, discuss, find solutions, support good causes, know things and workings of the nation and it's neighbours well - kind of like a relative for an ordinary person, taking part in discussion about something because one has often something valuable to offer, worthy of that role and partly because he/she is often around. So I thought that emperor needs support, needs to show his/her skilledness again and again and again.)

* * *

(11.11.2018   Some people think that children learn especially about names. I think that I learned about many things in life, but here is what I paid attention to in my name:
My first name Kaisa has the associations
kai saa = maybe allowed
kaikki = all
kassa = the person in shop to whom one pays
aina = always
aina saa = always allowed
kaikki saa = all allowed, or: allowed for all
kartta = map
kaitsea = to herd children somewhat like to herd cattle
aisa, aisoissa = controlled enough
keisari = emperor
About how this affected my life, the most important is the word "saa" = "is allowed" which meant that rules of game had to be always obeyed, and so just about evrything was in principle allowed even though often not in practise. The association "kai" = "maybe" hardened this rule via the need of always checking everything. The shopkeeper association made it needed to estimate the total sum, likewise the associations "all allowed", "all" and "always" and "emperor". "To herd children" was with the shopkeeper a milder version of "emperor", likewise "controlled enough" and "map". In my uopbringing my parents emphasized objective thinking with a picture of the whole very much indeed, likewise the culture, school and my parents' interest in science.

* * *

9.12.2018   As far as I remember, I was very skilled in objective thinking skills already in my mother's stomach. My mom was not at all good at thinking but learned school like things quite ok, so I could not copy from her, but since my mom's nick name Tita that was always used at home, is near the name "tiainen" which is a little bird that sings "ti-ti-tyy" and often lives near houses, maybe I was offered them as a forefirure to learn from already in my mother's stomach, kind of someone saying do they understand so much and my momn answering that they might, which I would have taken as a view of how things in the world could be, a world of little birds  too, and so would have learned from then singing. But so I never copied almost anything from my mom and only somewhat sometimes from my dad when we did something together. I think that such freedom is good to have, kind of positive for all and something many kids would need.
When I was a baby and my parents thought of what name to give to me, they were told also that it would be good if the baby too would think of a suitable name for itself, but I needed an advice for it and as far as I remember it, only very vaguely though, it was that if the baby has some strenght, some insight that seems to be of good quality, then see how high one could reach with such and choose roughly such name so that it serves as a helping aid in rising high  in skills as the child gets older. I had the skillof thinking of an individual in a healthy as part of the world, and understood about the connection of feelings and thinking, and from seeing ants I had learned how soldier like ways, moral work for the society amd athletic healthy ways of living & an individual living freely according to it's feelings and it's ages old nature produce the same result, and from my father's father I learned about selfish grounds for moral in educated thinking. So roughly in that direction was the name association "emperor", so via lack of better skills in choosing I chosen that name and my prents ended up in thesame result, even though they could tech me only objective thinking with a picture of the whole, some writing skills and traditional Finnish skills of living with the weathers and Finnsih nature and some understanding of Finnish art and Finnish society which is a grass-roots democracy. As a kid I was interested in politics but at about 12 years old I found out that such job was too difficult for me, my parents had given me too narrow starting point for it.
This text of mine might interest in connection with my ways of thinking : http://lainauksiatervola.blogspot.com/2018/11/13-joulukuuta.html .

2nd of July 2019   In school we were taught that tyrannies usually had a bad effect on the nation but there was one exception and that was "valistunut itsevaltias" enlightened sovereign ruler, which meant somehow wise and good for life, yet kind of tyranny but it had a positive effect on the nation so such ought to be supported, and the teachers said that that was their goal: they sought to educate kids so that they could be sovereign in their lives in a way that well fits into a society and that they would be so skilled and wise in their work that they could be kind of sovereign rulers in that what was their dream job that they had chosen, and of which maybe experience with adults shows that an individual often isnät interested in a good quality way in anything much wis´der in scope than what could fit as his/her work, so they could not be sovereign rulers any wider but there could be many enlightened sovereign rulers in a society, that was not a problem, instead it was an advantage they sought and kids liked.

16th of April 2020  I never grew up to the task of an emperor. I become a thinker and a writer, somewhat also a composer etc. I do not know how one could avoid emperor's official power going to wrong hands, tp foreign interests, actors etc. But if one just does some job anmd it's results are available to use for the good of the country, then such can work. But for it to be possible to use in government it has to be well thought of for a wide group of people, and so writing work, teaching skills is the nearest I can get to that task and it is also what originally adfults thought as my future when I was a child. But for such to work also the good quality works of others have to be likewise possible choices. But of course one must check the qualioty and where it is applicable. So instead of fine position, I ended up internet writer, so that my work is available also abroad, which I often like. I have never been much interested in some single nations, especially not in China. My texts need the background information that I am European and Finnish and that is also the ground for my skills, for the usefulness of my work. I do not know everything, I just write the pieces that I have skills for and that I think that are much needed.

8th of July 2020   The number eight (of 8th of 8th of my birthday) gives an easy way to handle large wholes objectuvely: see the whole as a picture and divide it first by two straight lines to four parts, and then by two straight lines each of those parts to two parts, and so nyou get eigfht parts easily and symmetrically. If you leave the first two lines with thicker lines, you can see the whole even easier. Once you have experience in objective thinking, you can replace even parts by parts divided according to justice, and so the division becomnes really good for objectriuvity: the nature of the parts taken intoi account objectuively.

If you ask, what it was like as a kid with a paradise association to my name, it was nothing,since the others did not want to give me any advantage because of it and they did not support paradise as a thought or life according to feelings as a value either.

17th of July 2020   These might interest many in connection with thinking of emperors or the like:
About sovereign enlightened rulers like many workers are, see my gnome skills text at http://learntalents.blogspot.com and in it "2nd of July 2019   In school we were taught that tyrannies usually..."
About women power in the same blog "20th of May 2020   "About women power

As a woman I have been delighted to see that..."
and the same day about bosses' work "I agreed with the birds in the trees..."

18th of July 2020   Also my blog http://healthilymoral.blogspot.com might interest those interested in government and emperors.

7th of August 2020   I have started a blog about how time passes and what the younger ones maybe would like to hear when older persons have birthdays. Today I made a birthday melody to it too, but my birthday is tomorrow. See https://fromhighlightohighlight.blogspot.com/ . The address of the blog comes from the thought that we remember past years via the content of life we used to have then.

15th of August 2020   Like with the paradise association to my birthday, which has brought me no advantage, the emperor = "keisari" association to my name Kaisa has brought me no role or position of emperor like. Instead it has just made my social environment think that they would like to try what it is like to be a tyran themselves, ans so I have been very much bossed around by for example my mom and many others, and my position as an objectively thinking individual in a democracy has been stolen to give position to them.When I was a child and teh subject emperors came up, my parents said that girls cannot be emperors but boys can, and so they gave the emperorlike roles to my little brother.

2nd of January 2021   I haven't had the skill of thinking of names and choosing a name but I just learned something of it. Some time after my other dog died my poodle had problems with criminals and he said that he would like to have some name like Roku, Bandit dies, but I thought the name sounded criminal, it makes the person himself a criminal and makes him die, instead of killing criminals, it brings criminals to one's environment, not as friends but from their criminal side, and so one is likely to do evil and die oneself or something of the kind. Instead I years ago saw an aprocot poodle puppy called Jedi, and that refers to a sword of light, so it is more likely to help to replace a white spitz that died. So I just thought of the ordinary situations and what comes to peoplke's minds from meeting a person with such a name, ordinary evertyday things. My name Tervola brings the association healthy ways of living, but maybe more from the point of view of envym so one maybe could do healthy kinds of things together like go skiing and to quite long walks with one's dog. One maybe could also build something fine tóf which others too catch the idea and start their own kind of mission that way, like my blogs maybe are such.

2nd of April 2021   I do not know what I have learned from my name association "emperor", but maybe reaching higher, taking things responsible to my heart and this melody that I made July 2019

26th of July 2021   I learned the basic view of my paradise theory, of how the different sides of life support each other, as a baby from a reddish brown ant, before I was given my name, if I remember right I was two days old, so it must have been August 1971, which is late summer when the insects are at their wisest because they are older already and the summer gives good possibilities for life. I have wondered why I haven't learned anything such later from the insects, but maybe that is because I had somehow marked that happening to June instead of to August, propably 10th of August 1971. 

1st of December 2021   The name association "saa"="is allowed" to my name Kaisa, I interprete to mean something like "is good for the world, for the living kind, and for the society, also if the effect is unexpectedly big and includes way of life etc, and follows rules with good quality and in a healthy kind of way, and is healthy in spirit, also in whether it is good to influence so at all or not". 

7th of June 2023   People have always thought that it is ok for me to have the name association "emperor", since I have always been very responsibly behaving in large scale questions and fair and honest in them and had a good objective understanding and a goal of avoiding causing harm, preferring to not to interfere, and so it has been ok for me to take part in large scale things, also since I am wishing well for the world and have healthy spirit and wisdom of lufe. But others in my environment who have stolen a chance to try something they call "Kaisa role" have been badly criminal and not deserved such right at all. I never have had royalty as a theme in my social life. I just needed a Finnish name connected with the large scale and suited for a part time writer or the like. 

17.6.2023   I have always tried to be a good emperor, good for the country and for the world, even if I can do only a small part of emperor'stasks. I have tried to prevent the emperor's power from going ashtray. 

30.10.2024   If obe think of the assosiation "kakka"="shit", "Kaisan kakka"="Kaisa's shit" would be that there is really much rationality in my views, like one ought to be able to guess from academical objective thinking and acadrmical work being referred to. There was really much emphazis on objective thinking in how I was bought up, in the school too and in the traditional ways of living of the local climate and in the ways learning to cope with the international inflyemcies and foreign vultures. My father had a kraah like academical objective way of thinking and building so a picture of tge world. I was much better at objective thinking so I thought several tines more and quicker and much more with ease, jyst building a picture of the world and looking at thibgs from that point of view. I do not use thinking for cunning, neitger do I lie or act or forget to think of how folliwed values kn social life affect the future of the world for exampke via chouces taken or wordings chosen. And tgat is too much rationality for mist, often too much even to mentiln straightly. 

Global though and local life

My upbringing was with science oriented not so knowledgeable parents, so what I learned about thinking tended to have wide areas of validity. In addition I have been very worried about the global future with technology, too much schooling, too hard working life, too stupid views and environmental issues. I have tried to solve such problems and since I am good at objectivity and good at generalizing and moral, What I find out in a single occasion I often can generalize to solve the same problem from others too, but that is so only in matters of general character.
On the other hand I live a local life, being interested in Finnish type of things, being adapted to just Finnish climate, knowing the Finnish culture but not finding even nearly as much fasciunation with other cultures, being an individual in Finnish way, having Finnish strenghts and not so much (unlike most Finns) the strenghts needed in other cultures or other climates.

Start from each blog's earliest posts

Nearly all of my blogs are written on some one subject and build upon what I have written earlier in that blog. So one understands them much better if one starts reading from the earliest posts of each blog and reads in time order.

Kind of emotional writing style

In some of my texts I use a kind of emotional way of writing which is yet not describing my personal emotions but more like an advice to the readers of which parts work fluently if they try them in their lives.
That is very much different from the expression of likings in my hobby like blogs about dog training and arts.

The name of Helsinki

I do not know, whether this has any signifigance, but when I was a kid in Helsinki, I lived in a very rationality oriented environment, which was a value for both my parents and for the whole capital district. So when my not-so-rational little brother was interested in following names and among them the name of the town, I thought of that too in the rational context, like was typical for all subjects around there. The ending "-ki"or "-kin" means in Finnish language "also", so the name "Helsinki" got via English language the association "hell sin also", which I have always taken to mean that one should in one's rational estimates (of things in the world and in social contacts) also take into account the possibility of some doing hell sin, so being more prepared, more safeguarded, on stronger rational grounds. So I guess that my book "2013: Paradise like era" is of that type too, especially my booklet "Curing modern horror scenarios" safeguards against dangers not present or not in power (because of good safety arrangements). Being more prepared.

* * *
6.12.2015On Finland's Independence Day
Of course there is also the view which I have always most liked that Finns have so high moral that the rest of the world seems in Finns' eyes to be fond of hell sin like things, and so the only way to get along with foreigners is along the lines of what Finns consider hell sin. But that view of course presupposes that one should not do any sin, that one should cure the rest of the world to be moral too, and that the lack of Finnsih type of moral in the world or in the capital is no excuse for being less moral, one should aim for as high moral as possible, always.

Vanha profiilitekstini

Hei! Jos pidit jostakin blogistani, niin suosittele sitä muillekin... Itse haluaisin erityisesti suositella blogiani "Näin opit lahjat ja taidot haaveammattiisi" (jollei sinulla alun alkaen ole niitä ollenkaan): http://nopeaoppisuus.blogspot.fi Luulisi tuosta olevan paljon iloa! Olen kirjoitellut taidoistani siinä toivossa, että muut siitä voisivat oppia. Itse olen oppini (erityisesti opetustaidossa) saanut lukemalla vuosien ajan aina silloin tällöin juuri Stephen Mitchellin erinomaista englanninkielistä käännöstä taolaisuuden ja maailmankirjallisuuden 2000 vuotta vanhasta (23-39-v. sopiva) klassikosta Tao Te Ching. Käännöksen voit löytää osoitteesta http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/core9/phalsall/texts/taote-v3.html Opin paljon, kun luin kirjaa hiukankaan tinkimättä omasta arkijärjestäni, arvelin, että ovatkohan ikivanhat kiinalaiset tarkoittaneet näin vai noin vai miten ja melkein aina jäin pelkäksi kysymysmerkiksi, mutta aina oli lukeminen miellyttävää ja jotenkin avartavaa. Erityisen paljon näyttäisi auttavan tavoite saada aikaan paljon vähällä sekä syvällisyyden, olennaisuuden, omakohtaisuuden ja ikiaikaisuuden arvostaminen. Tao Te Ching on mestarillisen taidon oppikirja.

Associating with those who have achieved something noteworthy

Being intelligent and associating with someone who has achieved something noteworthy in one's work is somewhat like associating with a tall person: sometimes it matters but most of the time not, one can ask the big one to do some work but is it any advantage for the bigger one? Or the bigger one can be too tall to fit in a romm comfortably. In some thinsg size matters but are those things important in life or in social life, propably not, it is just some work to do, work like any other work amd the rest of life is separate.
I do not fit into academical life. At my level of objectivity and intelligence the criterions for good quality work are very much the same as arts' criterions for good artwork: good perceptions, skill, something essential to say, skill in communication, easy to learn, matters in life, etc. So it seems that I would be fitted to some kind of work in arts or teaching of arts. But does it make me any happier than my parents were for a job in science, I doubt that it is the same or not so happy as they.

Work for common good means lots of effort saved

I do not have kids of my own. To a large extend that is good because I did not like school, so I would not like my kids going to school either and school lasts long years. On the other hand I can then think of all the kids and do a service to a larger group by caring for some major things of the world which someone just has to do but who. In Finland women often would like the men to learn some skills that are needed in life, but the typical suggestion has been that each woman should teach these things to one's own husband which is just absurd: 2,5 million times more labour needed for teaching the same thing. So if there is the same thing wrong with kids' lives or with the people's lives at large, I prefer to go the easier way: to solve the problems of the world, since it is just tiny fraction of the work needed at individual level if each individual has to be cared for separately.

The readers get wiser

When a song plays in the radio, half way through the song and most people know it's perspective, it's wisdom of life. In addition they have their own wisdom of life. So it happens that once a song is in the radio but not before, the listeners are about as wise or wiser than the singer.
So I feel to be happening with my thinking course and the text about the future of computers. I am good at explaining and good at teaching, so at some phace the readers have learned. And so the common thinking errors that bothered me everywhere, are not seen so often. Instead people have a grasp of good well working common sense like ways to think. So there aren't so much left to teach for me in these areas of understanding. My job in these things is largely done, or fully done.

Cyclic time

The largest use for my texts' ideas is in repairing the direction that the world is going in the future, in repairing future threaths and building solutions toward a better paradise like future. In that my book "2013: Paradise like era" in repairing the world's direction of development toward the original nature paradise, this time helped with the technology. That could bring a cyclic time: First there was a paradisefor a long time, for thousands of years or more, then it somehow got broken in a quite a short while, which though may have lasted for thousands of years, and then it quite quickly got repaired back again and there was again a paradise for thousands of years or more or much more. So in a way my book could be important. But if one examines what is original in it, there isn't nothing much of my own things but things that are somehow dependent on the times that we live: There is the biological picture of humans, objective thinking with a picture of the whole, Finnish rationally grounded moral, women's wisdom about the need for feelings in life, a common quest for happy life and more free time, and maybe something else too, but almost all things that are not so much personal strenghts as dependent on the times and culture's views on working life.

My intelligence quotient

I was around 25 when I went to intelligence test and got the intelligence quotient i.e. test result 170 when the average of the adult population at the capital district or in the whole country is 100. So they measured my intelligence to be higher than that of 99.8% of the population. That is a result that took me some time to adapt to, but brought me freedom that was very benefical for my life and for my thinking, so I guess it was right in some way or in another.
Around those times I was interested in reading some books about zen buddhism and that is said to increase skill and intelligence. Anyway, I honestly estimated that I tended to make in intellectual things some 100 000 rimes more observations about each subject than the average academical person in Helsinki district. My books are some part of those thoughst that I estimated to be easy enough for others.
I did not suit academical work. I find much more important questions to be of right difficulty for me.
I am also quick in my thinking and need lots of stimuli to be happy and with content to my life, with exercise that makes my capacity good. If I think a subject throughly through in a second or two while the average academical person would in years think only a part of it with the help of book knowledge. That is a huge difference in pace of life.

My most noteworthy texts

 I have written a lot of text in the internet in a variety of subjects. Some are more basic texts on an ordinary objective language, some more advanced on a more feeling language that makes the choice of concepts better and some leisurely written.


My most noteworthy texts are:
The far future of computers http://feelingcomputers.blogspot.fi/2011/08/far-future-with-computers-what-will.html 
Thinking course (in Finnish language http://pikakoulu.blogspot.fi/2011/11/ajattelukurssi.html)
http://quickerlearning.blogspot.fi
Work efficiency supports more free time according to likings http://workandfreetime.blogspot.fi
My paradise theory and thick book http://paratiisiteoria.blogspot.fi/2014/12/vajaat-30-paratiisia-parhaana.html and the book http://2013paradise.blogspot.fi
Curing future threath scenarios http://paratiisiteoria.blogspot.fi/2013/09/paratiisissa-on-kaarme.html
World is of love http://healthilymoral.blogspot.fi/2011/08/world-is-of-love.html
In Finnish language To a dream job = Haaveammattiin http://nopeaoppisuus.blogspot.fi

About me

I am a woman with no kids and do not plan to have them since I am already 43 years old. I am of the type that likes a sports hobby, has a dos (nowadays two dogs) and likes practical physical work and life in the summer cottage (don't have one), somewhat spiritually inclined and morally conscientous, likes freedom and variation and good willing social life as a part of the society, I also like arts.

I am much like what Finns think that Finnish speaking Finns are like, but not school oriented or whatever foreigners think Finns to be like. Of foreign cultures I am somewhat interested in but not as much as most Finns, and I am much more interested in the wide world and global responsibility than any single foreign country or culture. Of foreign cultures I am interested in happy ways, living practical life close to the nature, moral and philosophy of life and religion. I was bought up in the capital district, so thinking and responsibility about the society and an understanding of healthy ways of living are my strenghts.

People can know and understand more than forefigures

For someone to have thought something which matters, it has to be quite easy for many t learn, since otherwise others cannot build upon those thoughts. So a thinker is not necessarily very intelligent compared to others, not chosen from a wide group. Finding things that matter and that many can agree about demands some level of understanding, but that's it. A child can understand as much or more, even many children in somebody's aquiantages. Children have the potential to intelligence and wisdom. What is a recognized thought or theory, is just somebody's interest, somebody's who was with a good enough understanding that is not necessarily any better than that of many others. Children learn about the world and associate with many kinds of things, so they can sometimes learn amazingly much - and the too educated adult forefigures know amazingly little. The sma of course with other aquiantages: many can understand a lot even though they do not share the same majpor interests. It is no wonder if someone is better than some famous person. Starting from a different ground and knowing the same things that the forefigure noticed, one can notice also those things and something more f one's own or one's friends' thoughts too.
In learning about new things forefigures only does not bring the best understanding, since one needs room for individual observations too, from them one can later build better pieces of understanding. Individual understanding alone is also often lacking because peole tend tp have some common pitfalls, like a lack of a picture of the whole, a poor choise of social values etc, which a forefigure's example removes a little bit like more skilled company that allows also individual understanding.

I am not of media person type

I am fit for making some material for media and for teaching, not for being featured in the media myself.
Generally I can teach well: people learn and I can explain things so well that even evil persons agree about the need to be moral. But what comes to my social influence, that is typically toward worse, most likely because I look moral so others get moral looks without sticking to moral, and so they turn evil from the lack of social pressure toward moral. I am also almost always on the defence, finding grounds for my choices, instead of creating something that people agree about also when I am not present. I like nonverbal communication, so people tend to understand my views "naturally" when I am present and then forget them. I am also skill oriented and others typically position oriented, so I end up being lied to others that I am not as skilled as they are, even though they estimate me to be more skilled.
I am also somewhat difficult to classify. I like animal like things like sports and nature and practical things to do, feelings, gesture language etc, but I do not copy from animals so very much, more like some help for some skill every now and then. I have a somewhat poor memory, so I do some things differently from those who have a better memory - or is it just a better motivation, more convinced, for just those things to remember.

Intelligence and social ways

Different people have differentprofessional and other skills. For being social, sharting life and for being able to communicate well one does not need to be of the same intelligence level etc. Common sense reaches far and upon the sense of sight you can build a good thinking ability, see http://quickerlearning.blogspot.fi . One can also usually find common everyday life analogies for complex phenomena, so that others without your strengths can understand them well if you explain them, like "like walking over a small stream by stepping on stepping stones" or other everyday phenomena.
Happiness isn't so much a question of intelligence but of how satisfying life you live: do you have enough content to your life, do you like things in your life, do you enjoy social contacts, etc. Healthy natural ages of´ld ways of living give content to life and strenght to meet obstacles, they also increse intelligence and make social life better.

Areas of validity

Like typically with Finns and objectively thinking people at large, my thoughts have certain areas of validity which I have tried to make as large as possible, but which is determined by the understanding I have, what it is suited to. The area of validity cannot be widened to include new areas, new groups of people that I happen to get to know, since it is not a question of noticing different types of people or understanding them via experience. Like, if the largest group that I can say something about is vehicles, it cannot be widened to include riders and pedestrians. Or if it were cars, it cannot be widened to include bicycles, boats etc. That is so because we Finns are already good at thinking. We are not in the leaerning phace, but skilled already when we write something to be published.

Soldiers and army

I was raised in Helsinki where at least academical people appeared to be very doubtful of the need to go to military service. Since they could not think of better alternative, at least not yet working one, they let things stay but still were doubtful about the need for an army and valued a lot intelligent conversations and peaceful ways.
(In Finland it used to be that only men go to military service and they may choose between military and civil service. Nowadays those young women who so wish, can go to military service. The possibility came when I was maybe 25 but I was not interested in it, since I am not a malicious character and going to army brings a colder reputation, more manlika.)
I think otherwise. I think that justice needs the ability to defend oneself, one's group and moral ideals. And also in conversations those whose tactic works well for others too, get best listened to, and those with serious drawbacks to others get bypassed.

I have since I was a baby tried to be a good soldier. For me that has meant sports and trying to have a good capacity in most skills. But mainly I have been interested in the role of a strategist and in the viewpoint of highest leaders where one thinks of the whole society, both peace and war time, and of the enemy nation's workings and of the rest of the world with it's influence, dynamics and values. In personal life this has meant interest in social skills and in the workings of the Finnish society at the level of individuals and wisdom of life. That is why my book is somehow from the military point of view, yet at the same time quite peaceful and economy oriented. I have tended to think that to be a woman and to be from a small peaceful nation with democracy share this same mixture of wise tactics in military questions leading to a more peaceful situation yet with the army needed.

Biological picture of humans

It appears that it was my task to write the things that I thought that others could think through on their own. Well, they could not, and I was always kind of commanding that pay attention to these things, think them throroughly with your common sense and the biological picture of humans. So I was forced to write these things that I think that Finns and many others can well understand if they read them well explained. In a way quite obvious, but just an afterthought of mine. It seems that I am now done with this writing task.

The feelings my texts bring

I have solved big questions in our pictures of the world, so removed threaths from upon our future, both global (rationally grounded traditional Finnish moral, feelings, moral and rationality for computers, work efficiency) and personal (dream job, shorter working days with full wage and lighter school). Solving big problems leaves the reader relieved and puzzled about what there is left to do. Often one feels sad, kind of mourning big problems afterwards, but at the same time relieved. My solutions are mostly only at the level of theory and that leaves an empty feeling like theoretical things often do, since it is the level of practice that lives and fates depend on and that is still left to do, but still there is hope now, more freedom to live as a feeling being who cares and understands about the future of the world.

The scales in my life

The global future is a huge question, much bigger than anything else we usually associate with. If now that I have written what I know about global issues, I take a look at the scales in my life, it is much different. Global future for maybe three lifetimes or whatever it is, is at the scale of 20 000 000 000 people. My position after I have written is as a moral individual with a good understanding, at the scale of Finland, my hometown Savonlinna or smaller. So from the global scale of 7 000 000 000 people I have changes to 1/1400 or 1/ 300 000 of the scale of the previous context, plus time scale getting much shorter. Still my own life is at the scale of one person, which makes it still 1/30 000 smaller, that means 1/ 20 000 000 000 of the scale of my texts on the global future. And what I get money from is likely to be on the smallest scales too, my work less important than my moral. In a sense it aren't such a big difference though: I was just writing, a piece of knowledge tnat I happened to know, communicated with my teaching skills. That is very different from making decisions, from commanding anything - such power I haven't ever had. And now my work is done.

My upbringing as a baby

When I was a baby, my parents were interested in that I should grow up with a good capacity. When I was two weeks old, they took me along to the forest to see the trees, plants and little birds. When I was maybe one month old they took me along to a concert of a symphony orchestra and someone else there who was musical held me part of the time to teach me to understand music. (If I still remember it, it must have been opera Taikahuilu (= "Magic flute?") by Mozart by the picture of it's melody.) I remember thinking, oh humans' world is this complex and there is valuable wisdom about feelings too to be learned. So that for sure taught me to conceive more complex wholes. That wisdom of feelings I have now tens of years later found from trying to see music like it's composer, but I have sought valuable emotiomal wisdom all my life. The Finnish culture also values the nature, sports, individual understanding, freedom and understanding the society.

What I build upon

School and the university never suited me, I suffered from them and build nothing much upon them in my thinking or in my life at large. When I think of my education, I think of my time in the farming school, which I enjoyed very much and foud good for me in many ways, and my time in the wilderness guide course, which was a dream come true for me. In thinking too I build upon my life at large: doing practicalthings, admiring the beauty of nature, practising sports, taking part in the environmental movement, communicating with animals, singing, reading poems, painting, reading oriental philosophy and praying and doing women's culturally valuing things. I did not learn much in school, neither in university. My science skills I learned at an early age from my parents and my thinking got stuck in the university and it was a great relief to get rid of my studies there and to do practical things and practise sports which make me many times as intelligent just like that. Later on I learned a lot from teaching circus tricks to my dogs.

My intellectual forefigures

My parents were always enthusiastically interested in science and mostly only in science. So I was taught scientifical thinking and the goal of a career in scientifical research from early age always when I associated with my parents.
But I didn\t have much own ambitions of the same kind. My parents' views were narrow in the sense of science only, so I had myself the  goal of building a better world view. When I was 15, I saw a video of the Finnish philosopher Georg Henrik von Wright speaking and he seemed to have a picture of the world which I admired then. Laso later on I have valued the intelligence of theoretical philosophy and also listened to some lectures in it.
But more than that my thinking has been influenced by my idea of my roots as a Finn> of Kalevala, Vainamoinen and famous old Finnish paintings in the art museum Ateneum.
And even much more than that I have seeked to learn from the wild nature, especially from nature views and the little birds called tit, "tiainen" in Finnish. I have always been aware of the differencies of animals' lives and human lives, so I have always copied only features that go surely right in any case, like keen eyes, the widening of attention when one is in pleasant mood, sports skills, things on a very general level and lately communication skills.
I have also valued the profoundity of the ideal of life like in the Orthodox New Valamo (which in Finnish means roughly "my oath") monasteryin eastern Finland, and tried to reach for similarly healthy feeling responsible way of living myself. But my parents and the upbringing I got were purely atheistical.
I have also always thought that Finnish women are more intelligent than Finnish men, so I have copied mostly from women but seeked to follow and discuss with the views of all.
From about 30 years of age to maybe 30 I read about zen, Tao-Te-Cing and  New Age books. I also read poetry and considered it good for developing intrelligence since it pays attention to atmospheres, feelings and different ways of looking at things. Similarly I have valued music and art at large.
To be clear, I have always considered the wild animals and in some sense also the tress\ looks superintelligent. I consider also religion very intelligent but don\t have much experience in it.
I value especially practical professions for wisdom of life. Similarly I value sports.

What is big and what is not

If tehse thoughts really are that huge and come to influence as widely as they maybe might, then that is the work of many people and all of them together would be one or two sentences in a thousand pages long world history book, or a small piece of news in a newspaper. And the newspaper is full of news, often about bosses, countries and districts, of things that handle really many people, and still there are so many news every day! Come to think of it, when I play a song, someone has composed it and I admire such things as worth a lifetime's work, just best songs in a song book, all songs so. Or anythings else, is I for example buy something from the shop, it is some good idea, skill, insight with style and good life. Just about all the things we meet are the work of some who are very skilled and have worked hard to achieve what they did. And so we buy a newspaper and the piece of news is one among a hundred and rest of the year there is nothing about it - but a mass of things done, worthy glamorous things all over everywhere, that's what we work for, I just didn't notice it before.

How I learned my thinking skills

I have learned my thinking skills through practise. I was not especially intelligent to begin with but I have a character which values good spirit and good quality in everything.
The Finnish school takes as it's aim that each individual would be able to think things through by oneself and form one's opinions based on one's own good understanding. Storytelling, words, imagination, lying, style and depate are not valued. Instaed one values intelligent conversation where each individual tries to make life better in the society. So people are not seen as opposing each other but as comraden in a joint effort for good life and a good understaning of the world and of life. Social position is not valued but instead quality, moral and good character.
I tend to aim at thorough work. I value good quality. I am humble in a sense: I think that the world is great and I am just someone who does not have so much skills, so I try my best when the task is important. But if the task is not important for good life, then I let it go and do not bother about it.
I pay attention to almosy all types of things and never aim at certain style. I do not learn thinking by copying style but by trying my best in my own common sense like ways the tasks that I estimate challenging or important. I value free time especially mcuh, and music, sports etc. I value the type of intelligence that animals have, somelthing like arts. I enjoy the senses, especially the beauty of nature and quick motion while watching the landscape like bicykling or practising sports. I value religion, good moral and good spirit in things and think that these things are important in choosing the main things in anything in life, but I was not raised religiously, but as an atheist whose parents had taken science as their "religion". I value the way music perceives the world. I do not value math or computers but just survive them through. I think that they give no insight and are bad for thinking akills since they are so artifical. I prefer a walk in the nature watching the magnifient beauty ofg trees, such traing the eye sight for thinking and is much better for intelligence!
My ways of thinking are practical and with emotions and wisdom of life, with the sense of atmospheres too. So they are like those of people in practical professions like handicrafts and farming etc. And they are typical women's ways with the social observations done with the sense of atmospheres and an understanding of the social workings of the society.

My total work

When I was a small child I already felt intensively the lack of a proper picture of the world with which to guide one's life and solve the world's problems. In the following decades I built such a picture of the world and here in my texts I have tried to solve many big problems of the world. Mostly these answers are applications of rationally grounded moral, see
* my paradise theory http://2013paradise.blogspot.fi
* curing future threaths, see the beginning of my book at http://2013paradise.blogspot.fi
* moral for computers http://feelingcomputers.blogspot.fi the first text there and the above mentioned book's view on moral that is so mechanical that it could be taught to future computers too

In addition:
* a view on work efficiency and feelings that supports much more free time if work results count http://www.SoMuchMoreFreeTime.info
* advices on learning objective thinking and intelligence http://www.youtube.com/khtervola and http://pikakoulu.blogspot.fi the latter in Finnish language and contains a view on intelligence that could be used to shorten school
* so that humans could learn to respect natural healthy ways of living, it is useful if even some animals somewhere have learned human like skills http://lukevatkoirat.blogspot.fi and http://www.youtube.com/khtervola
* advices on learning moral http://healthilymoral.blogspot.fi
* feminist values: feelings and moral, explained for sovinists http://www.angelfire.com/planet/paradisewins/TPBCASAW.pdf
* feelings for computers http://feelingcomputers.blogspot.fi
* a theory of how to awaken from death via lightening one's way of living http://kuolemastajasurusta.blogspot.fi plus a guess on how to recover from ilnesses and wounds http://mututerveys.blogspot.fi
* advices on how to learn talents and skills for one's dream job http://nopeaoppisuus.blogspot.fi

These are the major things that I have written about. Now I no longer know which problem I should try to solve. I have only cerrtain answers, they are not fitted to every problem. So it seems to me that my work is already done, but of course I will keep my eyes open...

My starting point as a child

When I was maybe two weeks old, my parents took me to forest,, to see the trees. And when I was maybe one month old they took me to a symphony concert. So I learned at an early age that in life one needs to be able to conceive complex structures.
But my observational abilities must have been not so good to begin with, since when I was 2 or 3 years old, I had a wooden toy with pieces of different shapes that fit into holes of the same shape in a wooden box. I remember thinking that it was quite difficult because the wide cross and the star looked almost exactly the same and likewise a half circle and a circle looked almost the same. One never could know which of them fitted to a hole of the same shape since I needed to turn them and turn them until finally they fitted in. Somehow I find it like an elementary version of finding solutions to a problem in thinking, see my thinking course for that!
In school I was longing for more profound views and philosophy of life, moral etc.

* * *   

20.2.2022   My mom was like a stepmother, and she was a career oriented working mom emphasizing her career a lot. My parents tried to share childcare equally, the same with home chores, for example my father almost always cooked the food. 

About my new ideas

What there are new ideas in my thoughts, seem to be mostlly interpretations from one perspective to another, easpcially from feelings to mechanical language and from moral to cool calculations. These skills are a result of using one single pictrure of each thing and of the whole world in my thinking, so each side of things is seen in relation to the other perspectives every time that either one is used. This is a habit and skill that I had already as a child. Propably it is born out of the emphazis on holistic rationality in my upbringing and of how I was talked about the differencies of people's views: "Propably they both (in a discussion/debate) are right in their views but they notice different things because they have different skills. The thing of course is the same but they notice different things about it. A wise one would notice all those things and more about it."