Teaching children thinking skills, and about me and my texts

My parents had a positive attitude toward children learning new things. When I learned something typical for my age, for example to tie my shoelashes, my mother always said that it is a wonder how I learn, a little while ago she could not do it but now she can, miracle. My father always seemed happily satisfied when my mother told such, yhymm, smile. She did not have a clear idea of how I learn or what skills is like, instead she let me have my own way of doing and learning, my own idea of each skill. She also did not make me repeat my achievements, they were miracles to be told to my father and to other adults in our dauily environment, but they did not deteriorate into reaching for points or trying to achieve school like. Enev though my parents values school and science overly much which was a real burden.

I have written about the value of feelings and instincts in working life, from the point of view that feelings help to achieve best performance for any work, best capacity and skill. nd that following instincts like sexuality, sense of beauty and the need for social life is similarly useful. My blog http://workandfreetime.blogspot.fi introduces these to working life, giving a chance for much more free time with a full time wage on the condition that free time is fully according to feelings and along the lines of healthy natural ages old ways of living on all areas of life. On a link from that blog is my book Theory of Sexuality, or is it named Hard rationality oif feelings and instincts in that version. It is mostly about the value of feelings in working life but uses that understanding to explain the value of sexual affairs for working life too. My book "Tough Power Benefit Calculations About Sex & Women" http://www.angelfire.com/planet/paradisewins/TPBCASAW.pdf adds

Blogeistani näköjään luokkaa tuhat tai yli kävijöitä on viidellätoista. Monella tosin ihan vain kymmenen tai kaksikymmentä katselukertaa. Jätin joukkoon muutaman kiinnsotavan vähemmän katsotun. Hannele Bloggerin hallintapaneeli Käyttäjän Kaisa Hannele Tervola blogit Akvarellimaalauspäiväkirjani ja maalaamisen oppimisen ohjeita Näyttökertakaavio 1703 sivun katselua - 105 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 20.10.2015 Omia vaikutelmiani parantamisesta ja parantumisesta Näyttökertakaavio 1162 sivun katselua - 131 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 19.10.2015 Paratiisiteoria käytännössä Näyttökertakaavio 903 sivun katselua - 57 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 15.10.2015 Healthily Moral: Why and How in practise Näyttökertakaavio 1396 sivun katselua - 43 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 12.10.2015 Learn the skills of Finns!! Näyttökertakaavio 651 sivun katselua - 12 viestiä, julkaistu viimeksi 12.10.2015 Näin opit suomalaisuuden! Näyttökertakaavio 1063 sivun katselua - 22 viestiä, julkaistu vi

I guess that besides from copying skills from wild animals, I also to a large extend do not have some very usual forefigures. I have never copied from actors, never wanted to learn acting. I think that acting creates a mess. It removes safety nets, makes you vulnerable to pressure and hides these disasters from sight. Besides, joy and happiness in lfe come from you living life according to your own nature and if you even hide your expressions or pretend to be like somebody else, you go numb, unfeeling at that part of your life. Also skills demand that you do things in practise and not just pretend, since typically skills are not difficult for most but do demand that certain things are really done with quality. Also social relationships are rewarding if your true self associates with the true friendly selves of others according to the rule "Live and let others live", and if you only pretend these you end up in a soup of chores and obligations instead of free life in contact

As a kid when I tried to understand what work is and what it is needed for, I kind of thought that doing something useful that some others want to pay for and that a society is a kind of sum of the work done plus similarly free time activities' sum. So I kind of though that the idea in doing work is to make the world a better place to live in. On the other hand money is an important motivation for work, so this view does not taste like moral, more like selfishness. But when I come across something that handles moral, I typically like it. I like that people have feelings, that they understand the world also emotionally which I take to be a part of a full understanding. I also like that there is some idea in doing things, that it makes sense for the world, for life. I also like that there are good possibilities in a society for good life: just make your choises, what kind of life you want, what kinds of things to do, to aasociate with and that's your work, those are your hobbies

As a kid I read adventure books which I liked very much, the ordinary children's (mostly boys' plus about animals) adventures and from knights to animals and indians. I also read detective novels which I did not like so much. I read also many cartoon books like Lucky Luke. Later my parents forced me to read science fiction novels but I did not like the people in them. Later I read some fantacy books and liked the practical life in them. I also read as a young adult New Age books which I liked very much (especially about Zen Buddhism, Chinese classic Tao-Te-Ching translated by Stephen Mitchel and Carlos Castaneda's books). Around then I read John Steinbeck's books (about farming and practical life) and poetry which I liked very much. (This was in the capital. Now I have moved to Savo.) Lately I haven't read so much, mainly the local newspaper Itä-Savo (from which I copy, i.e. learn some things about skills and local life, and women's magazine MeNaiset which I do

I have written here on my blogs and on the links from tehre, many thoughts that go fully according to feelings. That aren't thought running wild. Instead it is largely a question of feeling understanding things right and being able to interprete feelings to thoughts. More exactly it is feelings and atmosphere impressions. It has much to do with being honest, with not mixing imagination or lies to one's perceptions. I also don't replace the perception by words or some predetermined thought structure. Instead I use common sense and everyday perceptions with feelings, social feelings, life situations etc. I use a landscape like view of the world, so I do not err to tunnel sightedness. I also know that each thing brings to my mind many perceptions and many associations and I observe them all, without dropping parts away. I set them all one by one to be parts of my picture of the world, each in it's own size class and own context. (If you find it difficult to see so many th

My birthday is 8. of August. As numbers 8.8. it brings to my ming four round circle like things of which two pairs are more closely connected. The healthy round forms bring to my mind symbiosis and a model of the world. So it is like one form of my paradise theory. I have not noticed it having influenced my thinking, except that I have come to notice the possibility of such a model and on the other hand my childhood environment maybe saw such a view as part of what I might be like because of my birthday. Late summer is also a time of warmth at the same time with the need to defend the good things summer brings, the loves in one's life from the coming autumn and winter. So that too may have affected my view on what is the task of thinking, theory and work. * * * (7. March 2016 As a child I had the last name Hari, so my name Kaisa Hari bought the associations "keisari" = emperor and "tsaari" = Russian tsar (emperor). So I took it to my task to cultivate some

My upbringing was with science oriented not so knowledgeable parents, so what I learned about thinking tended to have wide areas of validity. In addition I have been very worried about the global future with technology, too much schooling, too hard working life, too stupid views and environmental issues. I have tried to solve such problems and since I am good at objectivity and good at generalizing and moral, What I find out in a single occasion I often can generalize to solve the same problem from others too, but that is so only in matters of general character. On the other hand I live a local life, being interested in Finnish type of things, being adapted to just Finnish climate, knowing the Finnish culture but not finding even nearly as much fasciunation with other cultures, being an individual in Finnish way, having Finnish strenghts and not so much (unlike most Finns) the strenghts needed in other cultures or other climates.

Nearly all of my blogs are written on some one subject and build upon what I have written earlier in that blog. So one understands them much better if one starts reading from the earliest posts of each blog and reads in time order.

In some of my texts I use a kind of emotional way of writing which is yet not describing my personal emotions but more like an advice to the readers of which parts work fluently if they try them in their lives. That is very much different from the expression of likings in my hobby like blogs about dog training and arts.

I do not know, whether this has any signifigance, but when I was a kid in Helsinki, I lived in a very rationality oriented environment, which was a value for both my parents and for the whole capital district. So when my not-so-rational little brother was interested in following names and among them the name of the town, I thought of that too in the rational context, like was typical for all subjects around there. The ending "-ki"or "-kin" means in Finnish language "also", so the name "Helsinki" got via English language the association "hell sin also", which I have always taken to mean that one should in one's rational estimates (of things in the world and in social contacts) also take into account the possibility of some doing hell sin, so being more prepared, more safeguarded, on stronger rational grounds. So I guess that my book "2013: Paradise like era" is of that type too, especially my booklet "Curing modern hor

Hei! Jos pidit jostakin blogistani, niin suosittele sitä muillekin... Itse haluaisin erityisesti suositella blogiani "Näin opit lahjat ja taidot haaveammattiisi" (jollei sinulla alun alkaen ole niitä ollenkaan): http://nopeaoppisuus.blogspot.fi Luulisi tuosta olevan paljon iloa! Olen kirjoitellut taidoistani siinä toivossa, että muut siitä voisivat oppia. Itse olen oppini (erityisesti opetustaidossa) saanut lukemalla vuosien ajan aina silloin tällöin juuri Stephen Mitchellin erinomaista englanninkielistä käännöstä taolaisuuden ja maailmankirjallisuuden 2000 vuotta vanhasta (23-39-v. sopiva) klassikosta Tao Te Ching. Käännöksen voit löytää osoitteesta http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/core9/phalsall/texts/taote-v3.html Opin paljon, kun luin kirjaa hiukankaan tinkimättä omasta arkijärjestäni, arvelin, että ovatkohan ikivanhat kiinalaiset tarkoittaneet näin vai noin vai miten ja melkein aina jäin pelkäksi kysymysmerkiksi, mutta aina oli lukeminen miellyttävää j

Being intelligent and associating with someone who has achieved something noteworthy in one's work is somewhat like associating with a tall person: sometimes it matters but most of the time not, one can ask the big one to do some work but is it any advantage for the bigger one? Or the bigger one can be too tall to fit in a romm comfortably. In some thinsg size matters but are those things important in life or in social life, propably not, it is just some work to do, work like any other work amd the rest of life is separate. I do not fit into academical life. At my level of objectivity and intelligence the criterions for good quality work are very much the same as arts' criterions for good artwork: good perceptions, skill, something essential to say, skill in communication, easy to learn, matters in life, etc. So it seems that I would be fitted to some kind of work in arts or teaching of arts. But does it make me any happier than my parents were for a job in science, I doubt th

I do not have kids of my own. To a large extend that is good because I did not like school, so I would not like my kids going to school either and school lasts long years. On the other hand I can then think of all the kids and do a service to a larger group by caring for some major things of the world which someone just has to do but who. In Finland women often would like the men to learn some skills that are needed in life, but the typical suggestion has been that each woman should teach these things to one's own husband which is just absurd: 2,5 million times more labour needed for teaching the same thing. So if there is the same thing wrong with kids' lives or with the people's lives at large, I prefer to go the easier way: to solve the problems of the world, since it is just tiny fraction of the work needed at individual level if each individual has to be cared for separately.

When a song plays in the radio, half way through the song and most people know it's perspective, it's wisdom of life. In addition they have their own wisdom of life. So it happens that once a song is in the radio but not before, the listeners are about as wise or wiser than the singer. So I feel to be happening with my thinking course and the text about the future of computers. I am good at explaining and good at teaching, so at some phace the readers have learned. And so the common thinking errors that bothered me everywhere, are not seen so often. Instead people have a grasp of good well working common sense like ways to think. So there aren't so much left to teach for me in these areas of understanding. My job in these things is largely done, or fully done.

The largest use for my texts' ideas is in repairing the direction that the world is going in the future, in repairing future threaths and building solutions toward a better paradise like future. In that my book "2013: Paradise like era" in repairing the world's direction of development toward the original nature paradise, this time helped with the technology. That could bring a cyclic time: First there was a paradisefor a long time, for thousands of years or more, then it somehow got broken in a quite a short while, which though may have lasted for thousands of years, and then it quite quickly got repaired back again and there was again a paradise for thousands of years or more or much more. So in a way my book could be important. But if one examines what is original in it, there isn't nothing much of my own things but things that are somehow dependent on the times that we live: There is the biological picture of humans, objective thinking with a picture of the wh

I was around 25 when I went to intelligence test and got the intelligence quotient i.e. test result 170 when the average of the adult population at the capital district or in the whole country is 100. So they measured my intelligence to be higher than that of 99.8% of the population. That is a result that took me some time to adapt to, but brought me freedom that was very benefical for my life and for my thinking, so I guess it was right in some way or in another. Around those times I was interested in reading some books about zen buddhism and that is said to increase skill and intelligence. Anyway, I honestly estimated that I tended to make in intellectual things some 100 000 rimes more observations about each subject than the average academical person in Helsinki district. My books are some part of those thoughst that I estimated to be easy enough for others. I did not suit academical work. I find much more important questions to be of right difficulty for me. I am also quick in m

 I have written a lot of text in the internet in a variety of subjects. Some are more basic texts on an ordinary objective language, some more advanced on a more feeling language that makes the choice of concepts better and some leisurely written. My most noteworthy texts are: The far future of computers http://feelingcomputers.blogspot.fi/2011/08/far-future-with-computers-what-will.html  Thinking course (in Finnish language http://pikakoulu.blogspot.fi/ 2011/11/ajattelukurssi.html ) http://quickerlearning.blogspot.fi Work efficiency supports more free time according to likings http://workandfreetime.blogspot.fi My paradise theory and thick book http://paratiisiteoria.blogspot.fi/2014/12/vajaat-30-paratiisia-parhaana.html and the book http://2013paradise.blogspot.fi Curing future threath scenarios http://paratiisiteoria.blogspot.fi/2013/09/paratiisissa-on-kaarme.html World is of love http://healthilymoral. blogspot.fi/2011/08/world-is- of-love.html In Finnish language To a

I am a woman with no kids and do not plan to have them since I am already 43 years old. I am of the type that likes a sports hobby, has a dos (nowadays two dogs) and likes practical physical work and life in the summer cottage (don't have one), somewhat spiritually inclined and morally conscientous, likes freedom and variation and good willing social life as a part of the society, I also like arts. I am much like what Finns think that Finnish speaking Finns are like, but not school oriented or whatever foreigners think Finns to be like. Of foreign cultures I am somewhat interested in but not as much as most Finns, and I am much more interested in the wide world and global responsibility than any single foreign country or culture. Of foreign cultures I am interested in happy ways, living practical life close to the nature, moral and philosophy of life and religion. I was bought up in the capital district, so thinking and responsibility about the society and an understanding of hea

For someone to have thought something which matters, it has to be quite easy for many t learn, since otherwise others cannot build upon those thoughts. So a thinker is not necessarily very intelligent compared to others, not chosen from a wide group. Finding things that matter and that many can agree about demands some level of understanding, but that's it. A child can understand as much or more, even many children in somebody's aquiantages. Children have the potential to intelligence and wisdom. What is a recognized thought or theory, is just somebody's interest, somebody's who was with a good enough understanding that is not necessarily any better than that of many others. Children learn about the world and associate with many kinds of things, so they can sometimes learn amazingly much - and the too educated adult forefigures know amazingly little. The sma of course with other aquiantages: many can understand a lot even though they do not share the same majpor interes

I am fit for making some material for media and for teaching, not for being featured in the media myself. Generally I can teach well: people learn and I can explain things so well that even evil persons agree about the need to be moral. But what comes to my social influence, that is typically toward worse, most likely because I look moral so others get moral looks without sticking to moral, and so they turn evil from the lack of social pressure toward moral. I am also almost always on the defence, finding grounds for my choices, instead of creating something that people agree about also when I am not present. I like nonverbal communication, so people tend to understand my views "naturally" when I am present and then forget them. I am also skill oriented and others typically position oriented, so I end up being lied to others that I am not as skilled as they are, even though they estimate me to be more skilled. I am also somewhat difficult to classify. I like animal like thi

Different people have differentprofessional and other skills. For being social, sharting life and for being able to communicate well one does not need to be of the same intelligence level etc. Common sense reaches far and upon the sense of sight you can build a good thinking ability, see http://quickerlearning.blogspot.fi . One can also usually find common everyday life analogies for complex phenomena, so that others without your strengths can understand them well if you explain them, like "like walking over a small stream by stepping on stepping stones" or other everyday phenomena. Happiness isn't so much a question of intelligence but of how satisfying life you live: do you have enough content to your life, do you like things in your life, do you enjoy social contacts, etc. Healthy natural ages of´ld ways of living give content to life and strenght to meet obstacles, they also increse intelligence and make social life better.

Like typically with Finns and objectively thinking people at large, my thoughts have certain areas of validity which I have tried to make as large as possible, but which is determined by the understanding I have, what it is suited to. The area of validity cannot be widened to include new areas, new groups of people that I happen to get to know, since it is not a question of noticing different types of people or understanding them via experience. Like, if the largest group that I can say something about is vehicles, it cannot be widened to include riders and pedestrians. Or if it were cars, it cannot be widened to include bicycles, boats etc. That is so because we Finns are already good at thinking. We are not in the leaerning phace, but skilled already when we write something to be published.

I was raised in Helsinki where at least academical people appeared to be very doubtful of the need to go to military service. Since they could not think of better alternative, at least not yet working one, they let things stay but still were doubtful about the need for an army and valued a lot intelligent conversations and peaceful ways. (In Finland it used to be that only men go to military service and they may choose between military and civil service. Nowadays those young women who so wish, can go to military service. The possibility came when I was maybe 25 but I was not interested in it, since I am not a malicious character and going to army brings a colder reputation, more manlika.) I think otherwise. I think that justice needs the ability to defend oneself, one's group and moral ideals. And also in conversations those whose tactic works well for others too, get best listened to, and those with serious drawbacks to others get bypassed. I have since I was a baby tried to b